User blog comment:Bovell/Battlefield 3: Back to Karkand details/@comment-2224289-20110511221704/@comment-2195984-20110513143210

Well yes they were not too happy but it was mainly because it was a console port and it would have been much better if it was a PC exclusive. The original Crysis single player was very good but its multi player was not so and rather crappy so they wanted a new approach and tried a lot of new things which didn´t work out too well but if you´re gonna make a multi player Call of duty is a good for borrowing as it is very addicting. And i have to disagree with you on the other thing i see battlefield games go much much slower then call of duty as it has such huge maps as with call of duty they are much smaller and can be ended in 5 minutes or little more and i play on PC and i do not recall ever seeing a camper. I never liked IW either as they have always been "We have made our millions of dollar, no need to support the game and time to work on our next billion dollars" i never liked any of the call do duties personally except black ops and the original as Treyarch supported it a lot made the massive lag go away and did balance it a little. I always liked battlefield but i gotta admit that bad company 2 was kinda shitty as its magnum ammo just made it you die just as fast as call of duty and i hated when i was defending a rush game and there were 2-3 guys with extra explosive damage spamming them as they are unlimited and their unlimited noobubes behind a rock and a lot of times a grenade happened to land where i spawned. The vehicles in Bad company 2 was okay but they are just a shadow of the vehicles in 1942 and their glory. I was a massive fan of original Vietnam and 1942 as they blew my mind and i think the best multi player shooter out there but ever since then battlefield has gone down hill with bad company and i hope they restore it with battlefield 3. Only thing i liked about it was the teamwork which was the reason i continued playing it with friends.