User talk:Pedro9basket

Welcome aboard
- -- Bondpedia (Talk) 20:48, 29 March 2011

Play4Free
Nice gaymplay we did today.

Also, can you describe your kit names?

Because, I saw you as Medic7FTW both engie and med. WTH? kelleroid 21:33, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

I kind of failed while doing my 2nd soldier on my 1st account. But here are the names:

Assault: PedroD7

Medic: Medic7FTW

Engineer: MedicNo7 (*FAIL*)

Recon: ReconNo7 (don't use it much)

I used engi and medic with you. You could have said you were leaving, I was almost dying trying to revive you when you logged off. So, did you think I was playing fine, or did I failed too much?? (don't play for 10 days) Pedro9basket 21:42, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

Well, guess what, I didn't play for a long time myself.

You're a good team player, but if you see me rollin' with mah medic, then you go first.

If you injure the enemy, it will be easier to finish him off and revive/heal you in case.

I've got kelleroid (medic/main) and keIleroid (engineer). Not much difference, eh? [[User:Kelleroid|kelleroid 03:31, April 24, 2011 (UTC)]]

Hope you enjoyed my "show" as a Recon. I'm still training to work on it, but people say there's no bullet drop, but after 500 meters if I aim to people in the head it doesn't hit :P Pedro9basket 12:42, April 25, 2011 (UTC)

Add my new names (second account for ASS and REC): kelIeroid and keIIeroid. kelleroid 17:37, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

F-18 or -15
Take a look at this image. Click on it, it's of high resolution. So, what are those two jets? F-18s? F-15s? Something else??? 14:49, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

I kind of stood there looking at it for 4 minutes, I even had to take out the "fog" with the Picture Manager. But after a close analysis, I can be sure enough to say that's a F-18 Hornet. The other fighter that it could be would be a F-35B or F35C, but it doesn't like it has a wing that big for eighter model so, definitely F-18. Pedro9basket 15:18, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, and the front fuselage seems to be too skinny to be an F-35. Alright, thanks. 15:30, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Medal of honor reccomendations
I was reading your profile and i saw that you were thinking of getting medal of honor for PC and i havew to say its not worth it considiring its price it has very buggy, short and linear campaign the multiplayer was okay but it suffered map inbalance and it is pretty much dead on PC, i´d reccomend getting the old ones like Allied or pacific assault mainly allied they are outdated but they are okay. Death to the false emperor! 01:03, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for recommendations, man. I'll look forward to them. From what I've heard from 2003 reviewers I may expect to have the same experience I have with the first Call of Duty, but I'll get it nonetheless, it's a game from 2015 inc. after all. I've heard some solid reviews on Airborne, EA managed to put it on Origin and even heard PC Gamer stating is the best of the series (and PC Gamer is a hard bitch in reviews). What are your thoughts on it? Pedro9basket 09:54, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

Never played Airborne actually so i cant make any statement on that. But i do know a very good Wolf war 2 game Wolfenstein return to castle wolfenstein and the Wolfenstein that came in 2009 i think, its the one with the 2 worlds system. They are both very very good especially the new one, the first is good too but very very outdated.

Death to the false emperor! 13:29, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

Hey
Thanks for sticking up for me while I was away (I was in attendence at a Gettysburg reenactment, and then a storm knocked out my internet for several hours) It's incredibly ironic that LittleNemo can say that "80% of what he sees" are "troll comments", seeing how he's never, EVER made a single helpful contribution to any of the namespaces that actually matter in the long run.



How is that ironic editing on the wiki (assuming thats what you meant) has nothing to do with trolling.? And if you would actually decide to read more than 5% of my comments you would see i never actually called someone a troll infact except you but that was because your comments were obviously trying to start arguments and you have a troll face on your user page. Death to the false emperor! 17:14, July 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * Didn't you agree to fuck off? And by the way, stating an opinion, regardless of how contrary it is to your personal beliefs, is in no way "trolling". I let you have your opinions, you should let me have mine. Live and let live, aye?


 * The "troll face" on my page was made by me to make fun of Kim Jong-Il, who had, at the time, been severely threatening South Korea. Note the name of the image file, "Kim Jong-trolololo." That doesn't make me a troll, either, and that's no excuse for calling me a "waste of flesh". Йура [[file:YuriKaslov - Sig image.gif|15px|link=User talk:YuriKaslov]] 18:06, July 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well for one. I said ONLY if you would not do any "Hating" but now you were bashing on me.


 * I did not know it was Kim jong as the Trollface was clearly shielding his and i never clicked on it to read its file name, hell i didnt even move my mouse cursos over it


 * I never did not let you have opinions if you think "Defending myself" is not letting you have opinions you are clearly mistaken. And i have no problem letting you have these what you call "opinions" just don´t be a dick about them then. Death to the false emperor! 19:28, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * What I said to pedro was before you and I had our agreement, read the timestamp. Йура [[file:YuriKaslov - Sig image.gif|15px|link=User talk:YuriKaslov]] 19:41, July 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * Still dosen´t change our argument. Death to the false emperor! 19:44, July 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * Shit, you just can't let go of past things, can you? Йура [[file:YuriKaslov - Sig image.gif|15px|link=User talk:YuriKaslov]] 19:47, July 12, 2011 (UTC)




 * ! Death to the false emperor! 19:53, July 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * I can just resume the whole conversation here with this:

thumb|left|230px

Could you two shut up?? Pedro9basket 19:57, July 12, 2011 (UTC)

Licensing
No, unlicensed is not ok. It's just that I've become too lazy to go asking everyone where they got their images, so I just put that so it can be eventually deleted. Now that you've given the source, I've licensed it and it's free to stay on the site. 23:49, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

Trolled?
hey you getting trolled?, i know i may not know you much on the wiki but you've got my back..- Zephalian

Team Fortress 2
My steam is kelleroid (duh). The first one in the community search (out of 2).

Add me. kelleroid 20:47, July 19, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Photos of BF2142
I'm afraid I don't know of any filters excluding modded servers... The only thing I can ask you to do is create a game by yourself (in LAN or something), and there you can get images of unmodded maps. Unfortunately, you wouldn't be able to get images of action, and it'd be a little bit boring, but that's what I do when I take images of bases and such. Of course, you wouldn't be able to build strategies, but you can try to get into that singleplayer crack, or even if the servers are modded, you can still get a sense of what the map's like, depending on how modded it really is... 16:09, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll see about the rollback rights. It's not solely up to me, I'll have to ask Bond first. I'll tell you this much, I don't see any harm in it, and it is pretty useful for vandalism. Gimme a sec.  AdminRibbon.png UserMonthRibbon.png AwardRibbon.png 800px-Template Ribbon.png 16:29, July 21, 2011 (UTC)

All done. Congratulations on being our newest rollbacking trusted user - 16:58, July 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the nomination. I shall not make you question about it :) Pedro9basket 17:09, July 21, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the heads up, I've been removing leaked content in various places all day, and have warned 2 of the 3 users you mentioned. I'll go find the other now. I've been struggling to see what is from leaks and what is legitimate info. I think you're more familiar with the leaked content, so if you see any info or files from the leaks, feel free to remove it. - 18:10, July 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, I hope you don't mind, but if you would, all the legitimate images need tagging with  . And if you compile a list of the leaked images, I can delete them. You know, them doubts about you are fast receding... (almost as fast as my uncle's hair!) -  18:27, July 21, 2011 (UTC)

2142
Well, I have to say, PresidentEden78's been working on 2142, not me, but them sort of images do look good in the infoboxes, so if you can get more that would be great... - 13:16, July 22, 2011 (UTC)

The images aren't bad, but they're a bit fuzzy. Could you try saving them under .PNG format? It looks much better. 16:50, July 22, 2011 (UTC)

If you're keen on getting those images again, yes, you'll have to take them again and re-upload them. Otherwise, for your next uploads, just remember to save them under .png instead of .jpg. By the way, how do you take your screenshots? 21:27, July 22, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I'll get them again tomorrow (it'll take several hours of gameplay to have them all :P). I took the Sidi Power Plant and Suez Canal by pressing PRTSC (Print Screen button, at the right of F12) and pressing Paste on Paint right away and saving on .jpg. The rest I added BF2142 demo as a non-Steam game on Steam and pressed F12 for the screenshot (those come automatically as .jpg). I guess I'll have to use Print Screen and as I have odds of 1 in 3 of getting the add, it'll be little more than 1 hour to get the ad again (and therefore a new image). But I shall try to take one as .png right now and you'll see if there's major difference or not. Pedro9basket 21:36, July 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * Meh, the difference ain't all that drastic, not worth it enough to get new images. You can keep the old ones, but from now on, save them under .png, because there are some subtleties.  AdminRibbon.png UserMonthRibbon.png AwardRibbon.png 800px-Template Ribbon.png 00:30, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

Play4Free
I'll add you on BFP4F because i has no friends on it right now hahaha feel free to add X1Zeph ZephalianZephalian

File:BF3 M16.png
Can you just confirm whether this image is legitimate or not. It got deleted, but Sayak has objected... - 13:27, July 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * No worries, you did a great job with the rest of them. No harm done. - 13:46, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

Name colour
What does it mean?

And why you are cyan? kelleroid 13:15, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Delete
File:2142 CR.jpg? Sure I can delete it. - 15:05, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

BF2142 articles
8 win streak... lol that's something I can't even pull off on bots. Anyways, it's a good thing that you got the game, I'm sure you'll enjoy it. As for the No vehicles mode, if it's not an official EA thing, it shouldn't be on the wiki. Considering map articles are already fucking long, adding all the non-EA stuff would just be crazy. Just tell me, though, is this No vehicle modde used often? Because if it is, maybe I'd change my mind. 18:13, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

Forum Post Thingy
Referring to a post i made, is it illegal to take photo's from an official video? and.. i can't start new section? for BF3 article Zephalian 10:45, July 29, 2011 (UTC)

Aha!
I've yet to still play with you.. =P lets see if im a total noob on pc Zephalian 13:25, July 30, 2011 (UTC) P.S find me on P4F and 2142 Demo

Aha 2
Australia...Eastern Australia its now 11:35-40 Zephalian 13:35, July 30, 2011 (UTC)

C
What do you mean you would like the article? and would you please help me remove the "Cs" i don't know how it got there thanks. Zephalian 08:44, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

Were you talking to me or him?
Here Bumblebeeprime09  |  This is Bravo Papa Nine, over. 23:24, August 2, 2011 (UTC)