User blog:Delta1138/Just another Euroforce wishlist

First off, let me say that I am a proud American, born and raised in Arizona. That said, I've always enjoyed playing as the armed forces of US allies. Rumors have stated that Armored Kill will contain British or other European forces. I would love this, and have compiled an ultimately pointless wishlist.

Assuming the rumors about Armored Kill are true, and there is a British or Euro team, I've got a wishlist.


 * Maps taking place in Germany and Britain, to fit the "Global War of 2014".
 * Said maps are NATO/EU Vs Russian Federation.

MBT for NATO/EU, the Puma as the IFV and AA Vehicle, the Land Rover Wolf as the scout car, and the Panhard VBL as the armored jeep. Aircraft would be the AMX as the Attacker, the Eurofighter Typhoon as the fighter/multirole, EuroCopter Tiger as the Attack Helicopter, EuroCopter Panther as Transport Helicopter, and the EuroCopter AS350 as the Scout Helicopter.
 * The maps taking place in mainland Europe have the Leopard 2A6 as the

the IFV, Rapier FSC as the AA Vehicle, Land Rover Wolf as the scout car, and the Force Protection "Foxhound" as the armored jeep. For Aircraft, the Westland AH-1 Apache would be the Attack Helicopter, the Bell 212/UH-1N Twin Huey would be the Transport Helicopter, the Westland Lynx would be the Scout Helicopter, the Eurofighter Typhoon would be the fighter/multirole, and the Panavia Tornado GR4 would be the Attacker.
 * Maps in the British Isles have Challenger 2 as the MBT, Warrior as


 * The available camo patterns would be a mixture of US, RU and new camos.
 * New or new-ish player models.


 * The BMP appearing in more maps, with an emphasis on it fighting alongside the T-90 against the NATO/EU forces also using MBTs and IFVs side-by-side.


 * Man-portable, manually guided missiles. These would be more powerful than the dumb-fire rockets used by both teams and less or equal in power to the Javelin. They would be useless against all but slow moving aircraft, but would not be jammable by the use of IR smoke, or give any warning to their approach, similar to the dumb-fire rockets. However, they would require the user to focus on the target, and would leave them able to move only at a slow walking speed. This would make their primary uses either ambush or firing from a protected position.


 * As far as more standard infantry weapons go:


 * An RGB-6 multishot grenade launcher. Replaces the primary weapon, and prevents the use of the M26 MASS and the M320.


 * A Heckler & Koch USP Compact Tactical. With an 8+1 magazine size, and a LAM (Laser Aiming Module) attached, it would form a hybrid of the Glock 17 and the M1911. It would have a suppressed and non-suppressed version. The Compact Tactical is available only in .45 IRL, although the separate Compact and Tactical models are available in multiple calibers.


 * The complete XM8 family.The AR for Assault, PDW for Engineer, LMG for Support, and the DMR variant, chambered in 6.8x43mm Remington SPC, to function as a counterpart to the SKS. The XM8 family was designed by Heckler & Koch, a German manufacturer, after all.


 * The Fabrique Nationale Five seveN pistol. It would possess an identical damage range to the P90, have a 20+1 capacity, would have slower damage drop-off, and less bullet drop. The balancing factor would be the low damage, being a 6-shot kill to the body at close range.


 * More variants of the G36, such as in BF2.


 * The PSG-1 counter-terrorist sniper rifle, or the more rugged militarized version, the MSG-90. I suppose this one would be redundant however, as it is yet another semi-auto sniper.


 * The Heckler & Koch HK417, which is similar to the HK416, but in 7.62x51mm NATO chambering. IRL it is available in a 12" "Assaulter" barrel length, a 16" barrel length with accurized and non-accurized barrels, and an accurized 20" barrel length. It would be classed as an assault rifle, and would be be the 16" barrel variant. It would do similar damage to the G3, but would have generally low to moderate sideways recoil, with moderate to severe vertical recoil, especially on full-auto. Naturally, this could be compensated for with the use of a bipod.

Well, that's all I can think of right now. Maybe I'll make some amendments later. Leave your thoughts in the comments section please.