User blog comment:Callofduty4/Call of Duty to fall at the hands of Battlefield?/@comment-178.27.203.142-20110825003332/@comment-98.116.34.106-20110825034009

Actually, Activision isn't doing much of the flaming, but i agree. I mean Battlefield and Call of Duty games are becoming as big a flame war as PS3 vs Xbox. If you have one, or both, then play it. You may have a preference but that doesn't mean you should make it your lifes mission to bash the other one. Fanboys from both games are annoying. There are a lot of low age kids on CoD, but there are also some on BF. Both parties win either way, since they are largely profiting from the game. And if he is emphasizing their quality, by that i mean resolution and whatnot, aren't some other bad quality games good? Also, if you wanted realistic in a game, you wouldn't be playing a game. Sure, some realism is good, not like Halo vs CoD or BF, but you dont need a GAME to be super realistic, since you wont see a crapload of gore everywhere look in a regular shooter. Health would be like this: One shot kill for everyone, unless its in the legs, then you cant move. No HUD in any game mode, no seeing map, no anything. Im pretty sure no one would like a super realistic game, both in CoD and BF. Just be a gamer, not a fanboy. Play both games, and if you do, you can point out its pros and cons, but just dont keep bashing other games. We have enough flame wars already with some -less then par- singers and console wars.