Battlefield Wiki:Article Classification/Nominations

Under Battlefield Wiki:Page Classification, all articles are automatically classed as Standard. To nominate an article for another class, list it below to be voted on. Votes last 1 week. Usual voting regulations apply.

Archives

 How to Nominate  


 * Edit nominations section
 * Type  
 * Click save
 * A new sub-section will have appeared, edit this
 * Add the details where prompted and save

RPK
Nominated for Bronze

The RPK article has a pretty complete set of visual support, and has a nice amount of general information. Nothing detailed, so bronze is a suitable class.

Silver 0

Bronze 2

Standard 0

(Change, add or remove voting classes as appropriate)

Vote below by typing  *Class - Reason - ~ , replacing class with whichever class you think best suits the article and reason with your reason.
 * Bronze - as nominator.  AdminRibbon.png UserMonthRibbon.png AwardRibbon.png 800px-Template Ribbon.png 00:18, May 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * Bronze - Per nomination. Needs moar detail in BF2 for a better rating. 17:20, May 27, 2011 (UTC)'''

T-54
Nominated for Gold

A very detailed BFBC2V section, and a relatively good BFV section, I think T-54 is one of our best vehicle articles, even trumping M1A2 Abrams. It also has some complete visual support (courtesy of myself and especially our Russian friends). So, this article deserves some prestige.

Gold 2

Silver 0

(Change, add or remove voting classes as appropriate)

Vote below by typing  *Class - Reason - ~ , replacing class with whichever class you think best suits the article and reason with your reason.
 * Gold - as nominator.  AdminRibbon.png UserMonthRibbon.png AwardRibbon.png 800px-Template Ribbon.png 00:18, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Gold - Possible featured article maybe? But it could use a vehiclebox for BFV. 17:20, May 27, 2011 (UTC)

M48 Patton
Nominated for Silver

Sort of the same reasons as the T-54, considering the two articles are basically copies of each other. Though, I think it's a silver since it has much less visual display, and as such, I can't deem it as good as the T-54.

Gold 0

Silver 2

(Change, add or remove voting classes as appropriate)

Vote below by typing  *Class - Reason - ~ , replacing class with whichever class you think best suits the article and reason with your reason.
 * Silver - as nominator.  AdminRibbon.png UserMonthRibbon.png AwardRibbon.png 800px-Template Ribbon.png 00:18, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Silever - I'd agree. It doesnt have the amount of views of the vehicle unlike the T54and the BFV section looks small by comparison. 17:20, May 27, 2011 (UTC)