Battlefield Wiki:Requests for Adminship/Archive2

Archived Requests for adminship

{{Archive|1=

Section 1
Nominator's Opening Statement: In a few sentences, summarise your views on what the role of an administrator is and why you think you are suitable. This section should be completed by the nominator, if you are nominating somebody else, you should complete this section about the editor you are nominating, and the nominee should briefly state that they agree.


 * I think that I should be able to become an administrator for this site, because I was recognized by HeatedPete for my vandal reports, and even though I have few edits, I am a large large LARGE contributor at the CoD wiki. I have BFBC 1, and 2, and I have Battlefield : Modern Combat 1 and 2. Thanks. TMOI 18:15, June 5, 2010 (UTC) 



Section 2
Please answer the following questions honestly and as fully as you can in the space provided. This section should only be completed by the nominee.

1) Why do you think you should be made an admin and how would you use the extra responsibilities and tools?


 * A:  

2) How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the immediate future? When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images)?


 * A:  

3) Which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would this change?


 * A: 

Section 3
The following is for an admin to add (don't worry, they are all 0 until updated):

As of June 5, 2010


 * Total edits: 66
 * Of which 17 are to mainspace articles (25.76%)


 * Total uploads: 0
 * Of which 0 have been deleted
 * And 0 are currently in a category deemed unsatisfactory


 * Total blocks: 1
 * Totalling a block time of 72 hours


 * Active since: May 18, 2010

Voting
Vote below using  *Support - Reason - ~  or  *Oppose - Reason - ~ . You may also question the candidate using ''' :Question? - ~ . You may also comment or respond using  ::Comment - ~ '''


 * Oppose - You can be a "large large LARGE" contributor at the CoD Wiki, but that has nothing to do with contributions here. And although you claim to have multiple Battlefield games, it doesn't show, with only 17 mainspace edits. 648px-Flag_of_South_Vietnam.svg.png SSD  天皇陛下萬歳！ 01:37, June 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose - This user is usually well-behaved, but is extremely prone to intense outbursts during which he is extremely immature, irrational, and cruel. This makes him pretty much the antithesis to what a good admin should be like. Imrlybord7 01:38, June 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose - Fancy words there Bord. Regarding the block, I think it was unfair. But, 66 edits, 17 in the mainspace is unacceptable. I wouldn't support any request with less than 100 total, and even then it would have to be exemplary. SSD is completely right - Bondpedia  (Talk ) (Contributions ) AdminRibbon.png800px-Template Ribbon.png 11:00, June 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * Neutral - You seem to want to do good for the wiki, but try editing first before applying for adminship, look at Heatedpete, he was rejected at first but brought his edits up and now he is an admin. Ta00.pngDEathgod65  - Freedom at Work! Ta00.png 11:56, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - You mean well, but I agree with Bord. Also, more edits will be needed. Aren't there regulations for this? BC Rank 25.png Doc.   Richtofen  12:20, June 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * There is a guideline: It is recommended that you should not request admin status unless you have 100 mainspace edits and been here for 1 month - Bondpedia  (Talk ) (Contributions ) AdminRibbon.png800px-Template Ribbon.png 12:22, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe it should be enforced? Ta00.pngDEathgod65  - Freedom at Work! Ta00.png 12:40, June 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose - You have few mainspace edits, wich is not really important as it is quallity over quantity. And a major contribter to a different wiki does not mean anything on this one. If you build up your edits and their quallity then my vote might change. --CodExpert 18:04, June 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * BTW, CoDExpert has my permission to vote despite not meeting the requirements - Bondpedia  (Talk ) (<font style="color:black">Contributions ) AdminRibbon.png800px-Template Ribbon.png 18:14, June 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose - First of all, you didn't answer the three, questions above, secondly, per CodExpert, your edits on this Wiki matter the most, experience is nice, yet failing to substantially edit here is not.

Results
After 7 days, an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Unsuccessful

Bureaucrat action: -

}}