Battlefield Wiki:Featured Article

This is the place for nominating articles for the Featured Article

Archives

__NEWSECTIONLINK__

Rules

 * To vote, you must have at least 20 edits over 1 month (To prevent multiple account abuse, suspect accounts will be IP verified).
 * Any ineligible votes will be struck-out and ignored. (Per BF:VOTE)


 * Article must be a "good" article, preferably a gold article. No stubs.
 * Pages beginning with prefixes are not articles and are not allowed.
 * Article must contain at least one image.
 * Article must reasonably meet the requirements of the Manual of Style
 * Article must be categorized
 * Article must not have been featured before

Wake Island
I feel Wake Island should be the next featured article because of all the wonderful work SSD has done to make it look awesome. The article is well-written, has a number of user-made images, and is complete in nearly all sections of games it is featured in, as well as linking to the variants in BF2 and Heroes. Plus, it's going to be featured in BF3 (as if anyone didn't know that already) in the Back to Karkand expansion, so it's relevant as we prepare for BF3's release. 22:37, May 31, 2011 (UTC)


 * Support - As nominator. 22:37, May 31, 2011 (UTC)


 * Oppose - I'm not going to doubt that SSD has massively improved the article, but frankly, it's still incomplete and disjointed. Йура [[file:YuriKaslov - Sig image.gif|15px|link=User talk:YuriKaslov]] 22:40, May 31, 2011 (UTC)


 * Support - In complete contrast to Yuri, I think it's one of the best articles we have, nearly gold once the non-WWII articles are shunted off to their own sub-page, which I may do at some point - 13:40, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * It isn't really one article so much as a set of four or five articles... IMO it'd look much better if they were all on the same page. Йура [[file:YuriKaslov - Sig image.gif|15px|link=User talk:YuriKaslov]] 15:02, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * And if they all were on one article, it would be very long and take forever to load (don't forget, there are people who still have slow internet out there and ancient computers) if they were all of the same quality as 1942's section. It's better with them separated by the era they are in. 16:40, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Especially with the opening paragraph of real life context. BF2, BF2142, BFH, and BF3 (most likely) will have nothing to do with the WWII context of BF1942, BF1943 and BFV.  AdminRibbon.png UserMonthRibbon.png AwardRibbon.png 800px-Template Ribbon.png 17:31, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * As I said, it isn't one article but multiple articles. So far as I'm concerned, the page is functionally the same as a normal disambig page. Йура [[file:YuriKaslov - Sig image.gif|15px|link=User talk:YuriKaslov]] 19:36, June 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * Support - I was also thinking T-54, but this will do nicely.  AdminRibbon.png UserMonthRibbon.png AwardRibbon.png 800px-Template Ribbon.png 17:31, June 1, 2011 (UTC)