Battlefield Wiki:Article Classification/Nominations

Under Battlefield Wiki:Page Classification, all articles are automatically classed as Standard. To nominate an article for another class, list it below to be voted on. Votes last 1 week. Usual voting regulations apply.

Archives

 How to Nominate  


 * Edit nominations section
 * Type  
 * Click save
 * A new sub-section will have appeared, edit this
 * Add the details where prompted and save

Red Dot Sight
Nominated for bronze

The Red Dot Sight article is a relatively good article. It reads nicely and the content is relevant. Some clear improvements could be made (such as actually getting an image of aiming down the RDS), but it has a good enough base to, IMO, be awarded a bronze.

Silver 0

Bronze 4

Standard 0

(Change, add or remove voting classes as appropriate)

Vote below by typing  *Class - Reason - ~ , replacing class with whichever class you think best suits the article and reason with your reason.
 * Bronze - as nominator.  AdminRibbon.png UserMonthRibbon.png AwardRibbon.png 800px-Template Ribbon.png 01:43, June 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Bronze - I'll add a BF2 section later, as it is needed (M4A1 and the MEC Spec Ops weapon both have one. Йура [[file:YuriKaslov - Sig image.gif|15px|link=User talk:YuriKaslov]] 01:47, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Bronze - Per nomination. - 09:45, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Bronze - I guess I have more work to do in the image department. Good article overall, but needs more information on what weapons its most/least useful for IMO. 00:25, June 26, 2011 (UTC)

The Cold War
Nominated for bronze

Another nomination for bronze, this article is filled with information, albeit a bit unorganised and happens to be just a big brick of text. Relevant text, but it's having a glance at it is a bit boring. Some more improvement could be made, such as adding a battle template (that I'll be working on soon) and some images from the game to represent some of theaters of the war. Nonetheless, a very interesting article with a ton of potential.

Silver 0

Bronze 4

Standard 0

(Change, add or remove voting classes as appropriate)

Vote below by typing  *Class - Reason - ~ , replacing class with whichever class you think best suits the article and reason with your reason.
 * Bronze - as nominator.  AdminRibbon.png UserMonthRibbon.png AwardRibbon.png 800px-Template Ribbon.png 01:43, June 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Bronze - Agree. Йура [[file:YuriKaslov - Sig image.gif|15px|link=User talk:YuriKaslov]] 01:47, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Bronze - Per nomination. - 09:45, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Bronze - If only there were images... Very well written by Tsc08 though. 00:28, June 26, 2011 (UTC)

Destruction
Nominated for silver

A good article, clear and precise. It doesn't require a ton of detail, and the images are great. My only problem is its slight lack of organisation, and the trivia could use a cleanup, but the actual main sections are good. I also like this one because it was a real collaborative effort. Much of the work was done by Yuri, and there were some tweaks done by a bunch of other people, so it also merits a "job well done".

Gold 0

Silver 3

Bronze 0

(Change, add or remove voting classes as appropriate)

Vote below by typing  *Class - Reason - ~ , replacing class with whichever class you think best suits the article and reason with your reason.
 * Silver - as nominator.  AdminRibbon.png UserMonthRibbon.png AwardRibbon.png 800px-Template Ribbon.png 21:54, June 25, 2011 (UTC)

Silver - Now if only we could get collaboration on other articles. Good job, you two! Well done on this. I can get a D2.0 image of before and after a building is completely destroyed, and maybe a guard tower too. 00:28, June 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Silver - TY, SSD. The "pre-Frostbite" portion does need expansion, but I think it's a silver-quality article overall. Йура [[file:YuriKaslov - Sig image.gif|15px|link=User talk:YuriKaslov]] 22:25, June 25, 2011 (UTC)