User blog comment:Flamesword300/battlefield 3 is not realistic or a war simulator/@comment-58.167.90.254-20130703053655

This blog does not explain enough, here are my reasons:

1. The Russian Fedaration is no threat to America right now.

2. You can use any gun you want and you can also attach Russian scopes and attachments to American or European guns.

3. If you shoot anyone the bullet (lets say 5.56x45mm) will easily penatrate the skin, destroying nerves which would be very painfull and it also breaks up into small fragments which can easily pass throuch vital organs and cause almost istant death, and that is only 1 bullet where as in BF3 you can use almost half a mag on someone and they won't die.

4. People can survive a 50.cal or a M67 frag grenade but can be killed at a 100% rate when hit by a arrow or stabbed.

5. C-4 is used too much when it is not ussually ment to be used on other humans, It is classed as a Anti-Ordernance and Anti-Metireal explosive.

6. People run around (Lone Wolf) on a large battlefield which is crap beacause a sqaud is allways supposed to stay together and people always say that this game is all about teamwork.

7. The game is trying to hard to be better then or more-like Call of Duty, Personally I loved Battlefield:Bad Company 2 which had a realistic fell to it for some reason but now it has become like a Hollywood action movie and BF4 looks even worse.

Compare this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KC2AjUUVNfY and then compare it to this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZD9fWUUeL00 there is no realism in the BF4 trailer, and Arma is a way better game when taking realism into mind but i've had fun on BF3 and I still think it's a fun game im level 5 cornel on Xbox and level 32 on PC :)