User blog comment:Soldierofmisfortune/Okay so MW2 or BFBC2/@comment-1959296-20100322043950

im decent and both (or very good at both, but i have nothing to compare to =/) i agree with deathgod, mw2 is more fast paced where as bc2 is slower.

the thing that i like more about bc2 is you don't die to slow or to fast. because in mw2(which i liked until things started to go down the drain) certain weapons that are slightly better or a little extreme ruin the game completely. like how the m16or FAMAS beats most guns out because 1 burst (or 1 shot) kills you, yes the same about of bullets kills you from the m4 or something but it doesn't seem like it does, especially when you see 3 people die in 1 second from an m16 =/

along with now mw2 has ALOT of balencing issues that no one cares about that is accepted so probably wont change. such as thermal scopes make sniping easy for blind people, and the ACR is as accurate as a sniper rifle, all secondary weapons are more devastating than the primarys. fighting is like a joke with alot of people running around only using RPG'S duel shotguns and grenades than an actual basic weapon.

wow i wanted to rant lol