Forum:Adding administrator requirements, and voting requirements/policy

Ok, I've been thinking. This wiki has an RfA page. Recently, an editor with an edit count under 150 posted an RfA for himself. That, in my humble opinion, is nowhere near the edit count someone who is admin material should have when posting an RfA. I beleive we should instate some requirements for becoming an admin, update the voting requirements, and possibly making a policy for said voting requirements. Here are my ideas for admin requirements, which will be followed by voting requirements.  Sactage  Talk

Adminship

 * Have at least 100 mainspace edits.
 * Have the trust of the community.
 * Almost no or no records of personal attacks, vandalism, etc.
 * Have been on the wiki for at least a month.

Voting

 * Have at least 25 mainspace edits


 * Have been on the wiki for at least a week.


 * When voting, you must be able to give a reason why you support/oppose/(have a neutral feeling towards) the issue.

So, what does everyone think?  Sactage  Talk  20:22, May 5, 2010 (UTC)