User blog comment:Callofduty4/MW3 and BF3 reviews/@comment-2224289-20111113104621

Sound like good reviews from your part in the Campaign, Co-Op and Multiplayer department (I honestly won't going to be commenting the MP because I'm pretty CoD1-ish and if it was down to me, it wouldn't change a bit from its awesomeness, but it's your opinion showcased here) but I don't know if you're being correctly proportionate in Graphics and Audio. We all know how BF3's graphics are, so 9/10 for the Xbox sound good. But even on the xbox games like Crysis 2 and other high-end engine games do have a lot of work in the audio, let's just the sound difference in the BF3 between right over your head and 20 meters away, at least on PC it gives a big difference (to not mention the sound are recorded IRL, opposed to what I'm aware CoD does, could be wrong, but didn't record the last time I checked). And 8/10 for MW3 graphics..... I dunno what to comment mate, CoD refuses to take a bit risky jump and try a bit of their luck on id Tech 4, which is very smooth as well for better quality (which was a high point on CoD actually, taking risky jumps in hope of success, a thing you lack seeing today tbh...). Sure, you may not need to change the engine if it runs good, but that "not-taking-risks" strategy in CoD and with the '99 id Tech 3 should hurt in the reviews.