User blog comment:KazMiller1.0/BF3 Winning The War (Results)/@comment-3032061-20110601000112

I love the Battlefield series but I am unsure to whether Battlefield 3 will make the Call of Duty series crumble. There have been many CoDKillers but all of them have failed. Not in any particular order: MAG, Halo: Reach, Homefront, Gears of War 2, Killzone 3, Crysis 2, etc. The list goes on and on. It seems that CoD can never be destroyed. Although, interestingly enough, all of the games are exclusives besides Homefront and Crysis 2 (which weren't the best). Fortunately Battlefield 3 is multi-platform so it has a really good chance. The CoD series has a stereotype of being glitchy, nooby, etc. ALL games have glitches, noobs, campers, etc. including Battlefield. Yep, I said it. Although, some of the stereotype is true. CoD games are extremely unbalanced and glitchy. If Battlefield 3 manages to top MW3, players will still complain about it. "BF3 is dumb with its imbalanced helis." If you stop now, MW3 gamers won't make fun of Battlefield 3. It's like if one out of 50 whites in a town ate McDonalds. It doesn't mean the whole community does it. There is a lot more people in CoD than in Battlefield. Thus rendering that there are more noobs but the ratio is still the same. To tell the truth, I think Battlefield 3 will be a much better game. Just stop judging other people's favorite game and they will stop judging yours.