User blog comment:UberGamer/TOP 10 REASONS BC2 IS BETTER THAN MW2 (sorry CoD wiki members)/@comment-1990578-20100702143327

@PGB I agree Onslaught was not as good as it could have been, but EA prices it, not DICE. I feel it needed much more variety rather than essentially being a mix of Conquest and Squad Rush but against infinitely spawning A.I. Now you would think since EA wants Activision's head, they would have made it free, but oh well, guess not.

They only charge you the $15 to play game modes on the same maps if you didn't buy the game new. I don't know about you, but this was a day-one purchase for me since its so awesome of a game, but i understand the frustration I know a lot of people complain about EA's "Project Ten-Dollar," but its meant to fuck over Gamestop since EA doesn't get money when used copies are sold, and this was their plan to get said money. Their a business and they want to make money. This method seems to have worked for them well so far, despite the terrible content it usually hands out.

I'm not saying I agree with their ideas, but at least we aren't being charged $30 for 6 maps and 4 re-hashes over two shitty map-packs for a broken game thats played by whiny 12 year olds so Bobby Kotick can have his monies from the aptly named Stimulus and Resurgence packs that will most likely stay 1600 M$ each until the interweb asplodes (except for the one time only sales that knock off 400 M$ a month or so after it comes out. Resurgence Pack has its now I believe, but I don't remember if Stimulus Pack had one...).

I do feel that DICE needs to make more new maps though, as I am getting tired of the S.S.D.D. (same shit, different day - for those who don't know :) ) on these maps. Even an Oasis, Harvest Day, or End of the Line re-make would make this better, but we'll see what DICE cooks up if we complain to them enough as it seems thats the only way shit ever gets done.