Forum:Creating two types of stub classification

Okay, this is the third time I think I've brought this up.

Basically what I'm proposing is doing away with the "stub" classification, and instead replacing it with two separate classifications: "short", and "incomplete" -- the former would be used for articles that are well-made but lacking in content, whereas the latter would be used for any articles that are of questionable quality even if they're of average or higher length.

This is because in the past, the use of standard on small articles has caused issues, even if there's little else to add -- people sometimes assign them "stub" for the sole reason that they are short. In essence, "short" would be like a stub-size standard-quality article, whereas "incomplete" would be standard-size stub-quality.

Discuss. Юра 03:40, June 2, 2013 (UTC)