FANDOM


Archived Requests for adminship

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

TheManOfIron(2)

Section 1

Nominator's Opening Statement: In a few sentences, summarise your views on what the role of an administrator is and why you think you are suitable. This section should be completed by the nominator, if you are nominating somebody else, you should complete this section about the editor you are nominating, and the nominee should briefly state that they agree.


I think that I should be able to become an administrator for this site, because I was recognized by HeatedPete for my vandal reports, and even though I have few edits, I am a large large LARGE contributor at the CoD wiki. I have BFBC 1, and 2, and I have Battlefield : Modern Combat 1 and 2. Thanks. TMOI 18:15, June 5, 2010 (UTC)


Section 2

Please answer the following questions honestly and as fully as you can in the space provided. This section should only be completed by the nominee.

1) Why do you think you should be made an admin and how would you use the extra responsibilities and tools?

A:

2) How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the immediate future? When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images)?

A:


3) Which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would this change?

A:


Section 3

The following is for an admin to add (don't worry, they are all 0 until updated):

As of June 5, 2010

  • Total edits: 66
Of which 17 are to mainspace articles (25.76%)
  • Total uploads: 0
Of which 0 have been deleted
And 0 are currently in a category deemed unsatisfactory
  • Total blocks: 1
Totalling a block time of 72 hours
  • Active since: May 18, 2010

Voting

Vote below using *'''Support''' - Reason - ~~~~ or *'''Oppose''' - Reason - ~~~~. You may also question the candidate using :Question? - ~~~~. You may also comment or respond using ::Comment - ~~~~

  • Oppose - You can be a "large large LARGE" contributor at the CoD Wiki, but that has nothing to do with contributions here. And although you claim to have multiple Battlefield games, it doesn't show, with only 17 mainspace edits. Admin SSD 天皇陛下萬歳! 01:37, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - This user is usually well-behaved, but is extremely prone to intense outbursts during which he is extremely immature, irrational, and cruel. This makes him pretty much the antithesis to what a good admin should be like. Imrlybord7 01:38, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Fancy words there Bord. Regarding the block, I think it was unfair. But, 66 edits, 17 in the mainspace is unacceptable. I wouldn't support any request with less than 100 total, and even then it would have to be exemplary. SSD is completely right - Bondpedia (Talk) (Contributions) Administrator and BureaucratVeteran 11:00, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Neutral - You seem to want to do good for the wiki, but try editing first before applying for adminship, look at Heatedpete, he was rejected at first but brought his edits up and now he is an admin. Ta00DEathgod65 - Freedom at Work!Ta00 11:56, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - You mean well, but I agree with Bord. Also, more edits will be needed. Aren't there regulations for this? BC Rank 25 Doc. Richtofen 12:20, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
There is a guideline: It is recommended that you should not request admin status unless you have 100 mainspace edits and been here for 1 month - Bondpedia (Talk) (Contributions) Administrator and BureaucratVeteran 12:22, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
Maybe it should be enforced? Ta00DEathgod65 - Freedom at Work!Ta00 12:40, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - You have few mainspace edits, wich is not really important as it is quallity over quantity. And a major contribter to a different wiki does not mean anything on this one. If you build up your edits and their quallity then my vote might change. --CodExpert 18:04, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
BTW, CoDExpert has my permission to vote despite not meeting the requirements - Bondpedia (Talk) (Contributions) Administrator and BureaucratVeteran 18:14, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - First of all, you didn't answer the three, questions above, secondly, per CodExpert, your edits on this Wiki matter the most, experience is nice, yet failing to substantially edit here is not. CruzDude {Talk} {Work}

Results

After 7 days, an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Support: 0

Neutral/Pending: 1

Oppose: 5


Result: Unsuccessful

Bureaucrat action: -

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

TheManOfIron (3)

Section 1

Nominator's Opening Statement: In a few sentences, summarise your views on what the role of an administrator is and why you think you are suitable. This section should be completed by the nominator, if you are nominating somebody else, you should complete this section about the editor you are nominating, and the nominee should briefly state that they agree.


I've nothing to lose, so I might as well go ahead. I have been observing this wiki for a while now, and while it isn't the best wiki, I have witnessed a very good wiki, the Call of Duty wiki. If I am to be nominated and the vote passed for this seat of an sysop, I believe I can take my observance from the Call of Duty Wiki here, and I can probably do a very good job at being in this seat. This Wiki has very little administators, and could most likely use some more, and I am always open for the job, and I think I would do quiet a GOOD job, in fact, and that is why I am nominating myself for the seat of an administator, and think of it this way. If I am nominated, and I abuse the power, you undo anything I did, strip me of the power and ban me. However, if you never nominate me in the first place, you wouldn't ever know how well I may be quited for the job, thus the loss is only on the shoulders of you guys, the Battlefield Wiki.
--TheManOfIron


Section 2

Please answer the following questions honestly and as fully as you can in the space provided. This section should only be completed by the nominee.

1) Why do you think you should be made an admin and how would you use the extra responsibilities and tools?

A:

2) How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the immediate future? When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images)?

A:


3) Which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would this change?

A:


Section 3

The following is for an admin to add (don't worry, they are all 0 until updated):

As of July 25, 2010

  • Total edits: 430
Of which 63 are to mainspace articles (14.65%)
  • Total uploads: 0
Of which 4 have been deleted
And 0 are currently in a category deemed unsatisfactory
  • Total blocks: 7
Totalling a block time of 6 days
  • Active since: May 18, 2010

Voting

Vote below using *'''Support''' - Reason - ~~~~ or *'''Oppose''' - Reason - ~~~~. You may also question the candidate using :Question? - ~~~~. You may also comment or respond using ::Comment - ~~~~

  • Strong Oppose- "Total blocks: 7. Totalling a block time of 6 days." 'Nuff said. Helljumper U T C Wwiim191145
  • Strong Oppose - Same as above, but also with the recent block, I don't think you're ready VandalAwardHeatedPeteTalk 15:50, July 25, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Not enough edits, especially not mainspace. Too many blocks. Definatly not after this recent incident. Sorry. - Bondpedia (ContactContributions) Administrator and BureaucratVeteranUser of the Month: July 2010 15:51, July 25, 2010 (UTC)
  • Insanely strong (Chuck Norris strong) Oppose - Way too much block time, can be extremely arrogant and unprofessional, and is generally the start of multiple flamewars. 404 Error File Not Found Please Try Again
  • Oppose - Although I don't necessarily see bad in you, I'll oppose. Why? Well, You can get in such tantrums, that have disrupted the community, who knows what you'd actually think of doing as an admin. Second, block time - too long, honestly. Third, you say that we're "bad" compared to the CoD Wiki, but we have taken off of many view points of the CoD Wiki, we have based our core upon the CoD Wiki's methods, and if you seriously have any more to add, any normal user can do it and, heck, Doc.Richtofen is a super user over there, so we get the picture. Finally, after what's happened here, coming from you in particular, I don't think you'd ever be ready to become an admin here. I'll even quote, what was once on your user page: "**** this wiki. I do not support dictatorships [...]", which you didn't even take off your userpage yourself. And we were even considering perma-banning you at one point. I could go on, but that's enough. Just no. Admin SSD 天皇陛下萬歳!02:46, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Nothing against you (I don't know anything about any incidents anywhere) but you have a small amount of edits! You aren't even a Trusted User yet! If you added that and a few hundred mainspace edits under your belt, you might be in for it. - Unsigned comment was added by CruzDude (Contributions)
  • Extremely Strong Oppose - I can't take this seriously, especially after you so glamorously announced that you were leaving the wiki...then wanting to leave again??? F-22 Desert Raptor156th Tactical Fighter SquadronDEathgod65 - OMDF (Contact) VMFA-55F-35A RSAF
  • Extremely Strong Oppose - When you just let it be known you're leaveing? Plus barely any mainspace edits, recent blocks. Doltensig 16:09, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Well, yeah, per everything above. --CodExpert 16:17, July 26, 2010 (UTC)

Results

After 7 days, an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Support: 0

Neutral/Pending: 0

Oppose: 9


Result: Unsuccessful

Bureaucrat action:

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

CruzDude

Section 1

Nominator's Opening Statement: In a few sentences, summarise your views on what the role of an administrator is and why you think you are suitable. This section should be completed by the nominator, if you are nominating somebody else, you should complete this section about the editor you are nominating, and the nominee should briefly state that they agree.


I have come a long way on this wiki. I used to be a "noob", in experienced with a few hundred edits. Times have changed. I currently have the second most edits out of any non-admin, fifth overall. I became the first Trusted User, received the editor award, joined the vandal patrol, and I am currently nominated for User of the month. I think that my time for adminship is here. I hold something that many admins and even users don't have, a homegrown start here (started editing here). So now the votes are up to you. CruzDude {Talk} {Contributions} Trusted UserEditor's Award 15:44, July 26, 2010 (UTC)


Section 2

Please answer the following questions honestly and as fully as you can in the space provided. This section should only be completed by the nominee.

1) Why do you think you should be made an admin and how would you use the extra responsibilities and tools?

A: I have great experience on this wiki, I have dealt in situations, being a peace maker, and at other times a punisher. I have community acknowledge experience, with my many awards. Awards can only go so far. I have the 5th amount of edits over all, I have reated 20 pages, and I have helped to revitalize many other pages.

2) How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the immediate future? When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images)?

A: I visit daily and edit often. It depends when I am motivated to create articles, and sometimes I go on "editing sprees" so this all depends. The only time difference will of course be school, but any loose time is Battlefield time!


3) Which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would this change?

A:Well, my current editing (mainly articles) would not change, their may be more talk page edits, because admins handle the affairs of this wiki.


Section 3

The following is for an admin to add (don't worry, they are all 0 until updated):

As of January 1, 2010

  • Total edits: 1338
Of which 785 are to mainspace articles (58.67%)
  • Total uploads: 103
Of which 0 have been deleted
And - are currently in a category deemed unsatisfactory
  • Total blocks: 0
Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: March 16, 2010

Voting

Vote below using *'''Support''' - Reason - ~~~~ or *'''Oppose''' - Reason - ~~~~. You may also question the candidate using :Question? - ~~~~. You may also comment or respond using ::Comment - ~~~~

  • Support - I think you've become one of this wiki's greatest assets, and would be delighted to enter you into the admin's club - Unsigned comment was added by Heatedpete (Contributions)
  • Support - He was swift to warn me with a warning template on my page when I broke a rule. Not only did he do that, but when I went on to try and explain myself, he went on to further explain why I was warned. All of these were done in a very mature and professional way, which is what we all want to see in an admin. --Callofduty4 (Talk) 16:04, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Very good with the rules of the wiki, warns anyone who needs it, and as Callofduty4 has said, everything he does is very professional. He's done a good bit of mainspace editing, very active. Doltensig 16:17, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - He's a user that is very dedicated to this wiki and has shown himself in a way that is very professional, smart, friendly, active, and he would really benefit as an administrator on the Battlefield Wiki. --CodExpert 16:22, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong Support - I'm very pleased with Cruz's progress. He is the very reason I set up the trusted user scheme. He started as an inexperienced user, but showed promise. As he said, he's now showing serious promise in the community and in the mainspace. I think his achievements speak for themselves. A perfect choice. - Bondpedia (ContactContributions) Administrator and BureaucratVeteranUser of the Month: July 2010 16:56, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
  • One Hell of a Support - He's a great user - good, friendly person and a great editor. I was even thinking of suggesting him once. I think he could do a lot of good with those admin rights. Admin SSD 天皇陛下萬歳! 17:15, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong Support - I already thought you were an admin. That definetly means you should be one. Helljumper U T C Wwiim191145

Results

After 7 days, an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Support: 8

Neutral/Pending: 0

Oppose: 0


Result: Successful

Bureaucrat action: Sysop rights granted

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

SSDGFCTCT9 (Bureaucrat)

Section 1

Nominator's Opening Statement: In a few sentences, summarise your views on what the role of an administrator is and why you think you are suitable. This section should be completed by the nominator, if you are nominating somebody else, you should complete this section about the editor you are nominating, and the nominee should briefly state that they agree.


He has over 2,000 main space edits, and should be nominated for bureaucrat, so I will do it. SergantPeter Griffen BoyRadio Operator AwardRibbon
I accept the nomination. Admin SSD 天皇陛下萬歳! 00:22, August 8, 2010 (UTC)


Section 2

Please answer the following questions honestly and as fully as you can in the space provided. This section should only be completed by the nominee.

1) Why do you think you should be made an admin and how would you use the extra responsibilities and tools?

A: I honestly don't believe I should be a bureaucrat, but I do think there needs to be someone other than Bondpedia, with all due respect to him.

2) How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the immediate future? When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images)?

A: I still edit every day, or try to. I edit mainspace and see if ther are any concerns from users.


3) Which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would this change?

A:I still edit mainspace a lot more than anything else. I'd probably pay more attention to file copyrighting, however, I guess I'd be a replacement for Bondpedia. There isn't much of a difference between a bureaucrat and an admin. And even then, there wasn't much of a difference between me as a simple user to me as an admin.

Section 3

The following is for an admin to add (don't worry, they are all 0 until updated):

As of January 1, 2010

  • Total edits: 4,217
Of which 2,172 are mainspace articles (0%)
  • Total uploads: 0
Of which 0 have been deleted
And 0 are currently in a category deemed unsatisfactory
  • Total blocks: 0
Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: January 1, 2010

Voting

Vote below using *'''Support''' - Reason - ~~~~ or *'''Oppose''' - Reason - ~~~~. You may also question the candidate using :Question? - ~~~~. You may also comment or respond using ::Comment - ~~~~

  • Comment - With all due respect to your opinion, PGB, Bond's editcount come from a lot of user talk and file edits. Things that count for the community and for the licensing of hundreds of files. I may have a lot of mainspace edits, and that makes me a great user and a key contributor to the wiki, but does it really make me the best material for a Bureaucrat? Meh, I don't want to influence voting, so I'll stop there. Admin SSD 天皇陛下萬歳! 22:54, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - we need to have SSD's acceptance before we start voting R045HeatedPeteTalk 10:51, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - I will accept the nomination on the account that I believe that we could need a second bureaucrat, however, I will oppose myself as I do not feel as though I'm the best choice for thiss. However, I do not want to influence votes. If the others believe I'd do a good job, let it be. Admin SSD 天皇陛下萬歳! 00:24, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support He is a seasoned veteran here and deserves this step up CruzDude {Talk} {Contributions} AdministratorEditor's AwardUoTM 00:28, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
  • Pending - I'm not sure that we need another b'crat right now. But i'm more inclined towards support R045HeatedPeteTalk 15:15, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - SSD knows his stuff for this wiki and there is no better choice for another b'crat despite what he says. He deserves this through what he has shown in his ambition of improving this wiki through things like Operation: Renew, to simple everyday edits that clean up the overall appearance of nearly every article here (I think this has been about for longer than a week BTW, but I'm still casting my vote after noticing this). Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) President Eden Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) Enclave Radio Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) "Join the Enclave today!" Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) 05:02, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Hmm, interesting. Support. I accept people wan't another b'crat other than me, and if that is the case, then I can see very few people as or more worthy than SSD - Bondpedia (ContactContributions) Administrator and BureaucratVeteranUser of the Month: July 2010 10:01, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

Results

After 7 days, an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Support: 4

Neutral/Pending: 2

Oppose: 1


Result: Successful

Bureaucrat action: Upgraded - Bondpedia (ContactContributions) Administrator and BureaucratVeteranUser of the Month: July 2010 10:47, August 22, 2010 (UTC)

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

PresidentEden78

Section 1

Nominator's Opening Statement: In a few sentences, summarise your views on what the role of an administrator is and why you think you are suitable. This section should be completed by the nominator, if you are nominating somebody else, you should complete this section about the editor you are nominating, and the nominee should briefly state that they agree.


Well, the President has been a dedicated user for a while now. He's made over 2400 edits, around 40% of which is mainspace, and another 30% being files to properly license and sort them. He's a good person too: never once got in trouble or caused a disturbance. Some of you may think: "Do we need a new admin?" Admittedly, no, we don't, but I'm retaking this into consideration, as I believe that if a user is clearly capable of being an administrator and will be able to use the newfound powers for the advantage of the Wiki, I see no other reason why not to accept this nomination. SSDGFCTCT9 (Talk) 23:57, March 7, 2011 (UTC)


Section 2

Please answer the following questions honestly and as fully as you can in the space provided. This section should only be completed by the nominee.

1) Why do you think you should be made an admin and how would you use the extra responsibilities and tools?

A: To start off, I'm not sure why I should be made an admin. It seems like we have enough already. Then again, we've been running a skeleton crew since the summer. But anyways, enough of my qualms...
I would use the extra tools to move pictures to more relevant names and take care of more background stuff like I have started to do recently. I would also be able to remove unnecessary pages that I find and lay down the law on any troublesome users.

2) How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the immediate future? When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images)?

A: I'm here literally 2-3 or more times a day for an hour or more, either lurking and seeing what's up or going on editing sprees. My level for the next week will increase since I'm free for the time, but it will most certainly pick up in the Summer.

3) Which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would this change?

A: I pretty much edit a little of everything, but as of last night, I made it my goal to get more info on Battlefield 2: Modern Combat, since we have almost nothing on it and its main page has a serious case of "too long; didn't read". Also, in the past few weeks I have begun categorizing files, articles, and templates for what may now be incorporated to our collaboration that we have here (moving from fixing pages to fixing pages in a certain category).
Being made an admin, I don't see how this would change much, other than a more diverse amount of edits with the new tools I would be alloted.

Section 3

The following is for an admin to add (don't worry, they are all 0 until updated):

As of January 1, 2010

  • Total edits: 2,419
Of which 936 are mainspace articles (38.69%)
  • Total uploads: ?
Of which ? have been deleted
And ? are currently in a category deemed unsatisfactory
  • Total blocks: 0
Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: April 6, 2010

Voting

Vote below using *'''Support''' - Reason - ~~~~ or *'''Oppose''' - Reason - ~~~~. You may also comment *Comment - ~~~~

  • Support - as nominator. SSDGFCTCT9 (Talk) 23:57, March 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment/Neutral - I'm not really sure about this. I think that PE's a great editor, one of the dedicated few that are always here. But right now, of our main editors, we have myself, a sysop, SSD, a b'crat, PE, a rollback, and a few other guys. It seems to me we're making everyone an admin/rollback right now, and that we're lacking in "normal" mainspace editors that aren't Trusted Users or Admins. My current view is that we should probably wait until the release of BF3, and/or an influx of new, reccuring editors before we add more Admins. But all things said, Pres does deserve the rights, no doubt about that.
  1. Redirect P043HeatedPete - 07:38, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment - I would give a Support, but I don't really see the need for a new admin yet, maybe after Battlefield 3 releases. F-22 Desert Raptor156th Tactical Fighter SquadronDEathgod65 - OMDF (Contact) VMFA-55F-35A RSAF
  • Comment/Oppose - I dont find having half of the wiki as admins usefull i find having 6 admins is too much for this small wiki we only have like 14 or less active users and the power of an admin isnt needed currently sorry. and sry im still bit confused how to sign - littleNemo
  • Comment - I'd like to bring attention to the reason I decided to do this. I had been abstaining from it for a while, but I was looking at some other wikis, and Wikipedia as well, and they give sysop rights to those they deem to be able to use it for the better. They don't see it as a privilege, it just gives the user extra tools. As I said, yes, we don't need a new admin, but why not? SSDGFCTCT9 (Talk) 15:30, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
I'll send you a message about signing. How are we counting your vote for the results below, just comment or an oppose? - Bondpedia (ContactContributions) Administrator and BureaucratVeteranUser of the Month: July 2010 14:59, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - SSD emailed me about this. I have to say, it is clear that we don't need another admin. But I think we both agreed that it wasn't just a practical issue, but a reward. I think editors who have earned it and would use it responsibly, whether we need another or not, should get to be admins. In that sense, I think Eden is ideal - Bondpedia (ContactContributions) Administrator and BureaucratVeteranUser of the Month: July 2010 14:59, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment - we are post to reward them with medals like user of the month or something not adminship and do we need the extra set of tools? no LittleNemo 15:56, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

Results

After 7 days, an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Support: 2

Oppose: 1

Result: Sucessful

Bureaucrat action: Promoted - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 16:04, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

YuriKaslov

Section 1

Nominator's Statement: In a few sentences, summarise why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. (This section should be completed by the nominator, if you are nominating somebody else, you should complete this section about the editor you are nominating, and the nominee should briefly state that they accept the nomination.)

Commitment, reliability and trustworthiness are 3 key traits of a good admin. I feel that in the year and a half that Yuri has edited here, he has grown as an editor to display all 3. I feel that adminship is the natural progression for Yuri and that the time is now right for him to give it a go - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 14:51, September 7, 2011 (UTC)


I accept the nomination, and thank Bondpedia for setting this up. ЙураYuriKaslov - Sig image 15:34, September 7, 2011 (UTC)

Section 2

Please answer the following questions honestly and as fully as you can in the space provided. This section should only be completed by the nominee.

1) How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?

A: I try and visit at least once a day. With the exception of adverse conditions (ie Hurricane Irene), I don't think my activity will drop any time soon.

2) When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images)?

A: I do all of those things. I do "thumb through" pages from time to time, I edit a lot, I read and comment on blogs and forums. I tend to not upload many images except as the situation dictates.

3) Which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would this change?

A: I mainly edit mainspace articles. I also do a lot of editing on forums, talk pages (both mainspace and user talk), and do comment on most blogs.

Thank you. Please stay tuned to take part in the debate, which may include further questioning.

Section 3

The following is for an admin to add: (don't worry, they are all 0 until updated)

As of September 7, 2011 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs)
Of which 1339 (39.96%) are in the mainspace
Of which 847 (25.28%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: 143 (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of counting precisely without doing it manually)
Upload rating: Very Good - Only 4 of Yuri's files ever deleted, the vast majority of the rest (I checked a reasonable sample, at random) are properly licensed (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: May 13, 2010 (according to userpage header)

Voting

Vote below using:

*'''Support''' - Reason - ~~~~
*'''Oppose''' - Reason - ~~~~
*Comment/Question - ~~~~

  • Support - As nominator - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 15:40, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Per nomination. Yuri is a great editor and has had little to no instances where he caused a problem. <sarcasm>And how about that hurricane? I LOVED not having internets for five days...</sarcasm>. Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) PresidentEden78 Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) 16:17, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support -Prepare for one helluva long support...
Now, while I'd definately see Yuri as the only candidate for the next admin upgrade, in the past I usually thought we should wait until the release of BF3. I now think that to upgrade him now would be the best solution. Not because it'd give him time to get used to the added tools (let's not forget he's a very, very capable wikian and is also an admin on numerous other wikis), but with the recent increase in viewing counts, an extra pair of admin hands would be very much appreciated, especially seeing as BP's not sure about his availablility (per below), we've also lost Cruz to school commitments, and with my laptop tearing itself apart, I'd be very happy seeing Yuri as an admin here.
End support notice...
  1. Redirect P043HeatedPete - 17:19, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
Just because he is an admin on numerous other wikis doesn't mean he should be an admin on this one. --Callofduty4 18:23, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
What I say with that is that, considering two of those wikis he is an admin at I have also edited at, he has the experience of the tools and the extra responsibilities, and that he has the ethos and mind-set to be an admin here - in my view and from my experience.
  1. Redirect P043HeatedPete - 19:34, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
Contrary to Callofduty4's apparent opinion, I think Pete's making a very good point - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 19:42, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Yuri is very intelligent, a great help, and per HP, we could use another admin here. Bumblebeeprime09 the Pilot 19:30, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
  • Weak Oppose - I do not believe YuriKaslov is fit for the position of administrator since he often shows fits of stubbornness and wrongdoing. I need to see improvement before I am able to support this. That said though, he is a capable wikian as the nomination and support says. --Callofduty4 18:23, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support- Yuri is a great administrator on my wiki and even other wiki's, and I have no problem being an admin on this wiki. Besides, who really wants anons editing on this wiki anyway. Cod4, you already know what anons have done to the Call of Duty Fanfic Wiki, why does this site need to have it here? -MerchantofDeath 19:47, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
Yeah. We're in deep shit over here (If you will pardon my language). We could definitely use a strict-but-not-too-strict admin to keep 4chan off of us, in case they add us to the list of sites to wage a holy war against. Bumblebeeprime09 the Pilot 19:55, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
That might just be the worst reasoning I've ever seen on an RfA in the 3 years I've been using Wikia wikis. And that's not an overreaction. --Callofduty4 03:20, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per Cod4 and smuffikins. --N7 [ T|C] 18:33, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Whilst I see Yuri is more than capable and is an excellent contibutor to the Battlefield Wiki itself, I have great worries of him becoming an admin. As you can see here, Yuri is pretty totalitarian when it comes to vandals; most of the blocks he hands out are generally around the area of 30 days plus. Furthermore, from behaviour I've seen on other wikis, when Yuri doesn't get his way dealing with him can become very intense. As I said before, Yuri is an excellent contibutor to the Battlefield Wiki. However, whilst this is just from the view of my own editing ethic, I do not personlly see him fit to be an administrator. --Smuff[The cake is a lie] 18:31, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
Smuff has 14 mainspace edits. Voting requirements demand 20. This vote will, therefore, not be counted - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 19:54, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
Not really in the spirit of editing, is it Smuff. Vote reinstated regardless - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 20:36, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
Think of it as the means to an end. --Smuff[The cake is a lie] 21:56, September 9, 2011 (UTC)
  • I know in the link I gave Yuri hasn't handed out any bans in about a month (nor has anyone); however I'm not too sure what the situation is like over there. From what I can gather it's fairly inactive. --Smuff[The cake is a lie] 18:36, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
    Believe it or not, the idea came from this wiki's flagship administrator, SSD. Before he suggested the idea, I adhered to the policies I created. I get intense with vandals because stuff like this and this used to happen to me a lot, so yes, I had personal vendettas against some specific vandals. That being said, as can be seen on the other wikis I'm an admin at, I've lightened up on the banning. I don't think my frustration with vandals who persist over the course of a half a year (like azure doctor) is really not understandable.
    I made it a point to stop being so iron-fisted when it came to banning, which is why I haven't made any long bans on any of the wikis I admin at in about three or so months. ЙураYuriKaslov - Sig image 19:04, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
    Then couldn't you have just, like, fully protected your userpage? --Smuff[The cake is a lie] 20:27, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
    I did. Thing is, A) I'm not an admin at the CoD wiki or this one, so I had to wait for several hours before anybody did anything, and B) there are other ways to insult someone aside from editing their userpage. Azure Doctor and his many... many... IPs would vandalize mainspace pages and post disparaging blog comments as well. It drove me to my wits' end. ЙураYuriKaslov - Sig image 20:32, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose - As per the others, Yuri's behaviour could be a problem. I have no doubts that he is a fantastic editor. However, from what I have seen of Yuri his behaviour can be slightly out of line, and at some times volatile. I will have to see some good evidence of a change in behaviour before I can support Yuri to become a sysop. TheDocRichtofen (Talk) 19:49, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Yuri may had problems of stubborness when showing his opinions in the past with guys like nemo, but I don't see that happening that often to be problem (my opinion, may not be yours. It was expressing his opinion and discussing it, no flame involved), and he is a fantastic editor with a record of over 1,000 mainspace edits, he's responsible and take projects for real, such an example is the Refractor games cut content. He deserves an admin hot seat, and I believe he'll do well with it.This is Pedro9basket, go ahead... Roger, editing now 23:52, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
    I think at this point Nemo and myself have put our differences in the past. ЙураYuriKaslov - Sig image 00:00, September 9, 2011 (UTC)
  • Strong Support- yuri is very great. He's quick and smart. He a really good editor and is friendly I can't see any reason to hate him.-RIKA * SATAKO - nanodesu 01:25, September 9, 2011 (UTC)
  • Weak Oppose - Per the others, he is a fantastic editor, but behaviour potentially could be a problem. F-22 Desert Raptor156th Tactical Fighter SquadronDEathgod65 - OMDF (Contact) VMFA-55F-35A RSAF

Results

After 7 days, an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Support: 7

Oppose: 5

Result: Successful

Bureaucrat action: Upgraded accordingly

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

PresidentEden78 (B'crat)

Section 1

Nominator's Statement: In a few sentences, summarise why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. (This section should be completed by the nominator, if you are nominating somebody else, you should complete this section about the editor you are nominating, and the nominee should briefly state that they accept the nomination.)

I hope PE78 will excuse me, I'm going to spend the first half of this talking about somebody else entirely. SSD has emailed me his intention to quit editing here - I've been told he doesn't want a fuss - I'm trying to not attract attention to my departure, so please don't go bothering him. Furthermore, that's all I'm going to say on the matter. But I'm also likely going to be dropping in activity sometime in about a month, so I think it's time we got a new b'crat
Well, now that the need for a new b'crat is over and done with - why PE78? My first choice for replacing SSD (who agrees with me on the matter, as it happens - If I'm not gonna be there anymore, he's the best replacement I can think of, with his constant attention to the wiki, great editing and overall enthusiasm), Eden is a committed, trustworthy and experienced editor, who is regularly active on the site, both in community and mainspace editing (I refer you to my nomination of him for 'User of the Month - August 2011'. I think that says more than I can repeat here) - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 15:20, September 7, 2011 (UTC)


I will miss having SSD around here as he was a great asset and the best editor here, racking up a total of over 10,000 edits in just shy of two years being here. Regardless, I humbly accept Bond's nomination for me as a bureaucrat. Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) PresidentEden78 Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) 19:17, September 7, 2011 (UTC)

Section 2

Please answer the following questions honestly and as fully as you can in the space provided. This section should only be completed by the nominee.

1) How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?

A: I am here multiple times a day, lurking about and seeing whats been changed. I am currently in college, so my edits will not be as major as they have been this summer, but when I have time, and especially after BF3 comes out, I will certainly be more active here due to the wealth of incoming knowledge.

2) When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images)?

A: Recently, I have been editing less and sticking more to blogs and checking recent changes. Although I would like to do more editing, I only have so much time. That doesn't mean I won't edit at all, but it will not be as often as summer.

3) Which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an adminb'crat, would this change?

A: I mainly edit mainspace articles and templates, but have recently increased my forum, blog, and talk page edits after becoming an admin. Becoming a bureaucrat, I would be able to direct Wikia staff to areas of interest, such as helping with MarkvA and JoePlay making our backdrop and main page up to date with the latest Battlefield games. Another thing I would like to do is to get the portals running much like other wikis, rather then have them as a page listing templates, but that would require coding knowledge I don't have.

Thank you. Please stay tuned to take part in the debate, which may include further questioning.

Section 3

The following is for an admin to add: (don't worry, they are all 0 until updated)

As of September 7, 2011 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs)
Of which 1801 (34.5%) are in the mainspace
Of which 647 (12.39%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: 825 (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of counting precisely without doing it manually)
Upload rating: Good - Many of the earlier uploads deleted, but those that remain are mainly licensed correctly (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: April 6, 2010 (according to userpage header)

Voting

Vote below using:

*'''Support''' - Reason - ~~~~
*'''Oppose''' - Reason - ~~~~
*Comment/Question - ~~~~

  • Support - As nominator - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 15:20, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Basically per nomination. I doubt the President would even need to fill in the blanks for anyone to see why he should be a b'crat.
  1. Redirect P043HeatedPete - 17:19, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Mr. President's friendly, helpful, and generally a pretty cool guy. From what I've seen he's a pretty good editor. In my opinion, he deserves B'crat flags. ЙураYuriKaslov - Sig image 17:29, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Per Yuri & Per Nomination. Bumblebeeprime09 the Pilot 20:23, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - No problems here. --Callofduty4 18:25, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Per all. TheDocRichtofen (Talk) 19:50, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Per all and nomination. F-22 Desert Raptor156th Tactical Fighter SquadronDEathgod65 - OMDF (Contact) VMFA-55F-35A RSAF
  • Support - Per nomination. It is not usual I pass through in the Wikia in an entire week and don't see him doing editing sprees. He's very active and fair admin and very helpful onto guys' request (like me asking help to choose a new damn PC). No need to think otherwise on giving him support onto the B'crat spot. This is Pedro9basket, go ahead... Roger, editing now 10:25, September 9, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Per all.do I have to say more were at 9 supports and 0 oppose's,mizda el presedente wins by a landslide-Rika * satako - Nano20px 04:48, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

Results

After 7 days, an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Support: 9

Oppose: 0

Result: Successful

Bureaucrat action: Upgraded accordingly

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

Maxwell123

1: Statements

  • If you are nominating somebody else on their behalf, fill in section 1.1. The nominee should then complete section 1.2.
  • If you are nominating yourself, ignore 1.1 and only complete 1.2


1.1: Nominator's Statement

(This section should be completed by the nominator, if nominating somebody else. If you are self-nominating, ignore this section and proceed to section 1.2)

In a few sentences, summarize why you think the nominee is suitable for the role of an administrator.

  • Maxwell is a very well-established editor; he's been around for over 1 year, and in his time he's made numerous suggestions and edits for the betterment of the wiki, including being one of our top image uploaders and generally a very avid editor. Many of his suggestions and changes were, in fact, adopted and are in use. He also produces and provides quite a few videos for our YouTube channel (I believe he runs it, as well). He's also, generally, a very nice and pretty helpful guy.


1.2: Nominee's Statement

(This section should only be completed by the nominee)

If a user is nominated by another user, the nominee must accept the nomination. Briefly summarize why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. You may also wish to consider the following questions when writing your statement:

  1. How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?
  2. When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images) and which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would either of these change?
  • 1. Usually i visit everyday, if there is something minor to adjust i'll go for it. About activity level: because of christmas holiday and beginning of school it have lead to an temporary break, also i do play much BC2 for the moment (currently lvl 47 heading towards 50). Once i get to 50 i think i will stop for an moment and coming back to our wiki.
  • 2. First when i enter this website i often press the activity tab to scroll down to see the recent edits if there is something interesting pages being adjusted. Also i take a notice about image uploads, apart from that the news section should also be mentioned. If i should consider what i like to do t is: uploading pictures in good quality, include new BFP4F weapons in articles and BFH. Upload some digital media regarding how weapon look/sound or perform in-game. Sometimes i do edit templates but most only about weapons. On the forum/blog section maybe i should be more actively contribute about posting more often.
    Maxwell123 13:33, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

2: Statistics

The following is for an admin to add:

As of January 19, 2012 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs)
  • Total edits: 5,949 (Using Special:Editcount)
    • Of which 3,308 (55.6%) are in the mainspace
    • Of which 161 (2.71%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: Approx. 800 or 900 (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of stating precisely without counting manually)
    • Upload rating: (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
      • Good - He originally didn't do very well in terms of licensing, but he's since improved vastly. Not many of his images have been deleted, either.
  • Total blocks: 1 (Using Special:Log)
    • Totalling a block time of 3 Days
  • Active since: December 19, 2010 (according to userpage header)
Signature of assessing admin: ЙураYuriKaslov - Sig image 00:19, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

3: Voting


Support: 7
Oppose: 0
  • Support - As nominator. ЙураYuriKaslov - Sig image 00:19, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support - Per nomination. Maxwell's images and ideas are ones of a quality that just a few can match, and he did a stunning work the 13 months he's been here, almost reaching 6,000 edits. Truly deserved. Pedro9basket (talk) Trusted User Editor Award 00:24, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • Strong Support - Maxwell uploads nice pictures and has been here for a long time. Because of him, he's inspired me to upload pictures to the wiki when I thought it'd be too hard and boring, yet it became the opposite. Thanks Maxwell! 3rd Ranger New Orders - Edit At Will Newcomer&#039;s Ribbon 02:00, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support - Maxwell is a robot IMO. But his uploads in the catigory of Uploads is outstanding.--BFBC2V UH-1 ICONSlopijoe Nanodesu?TrustRibbon 05:56, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support - Even though his rather poor grammar could pose somewhat of a problem, he has contributed to this wiki in great strides, and would make a wonderful admin for years to come. Charcoal121 19:12, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
@C121 you do realise he's not from the USA or UK. he's from Norway.--BFBC2V UH-1 ICONSlopijoe Nanodesu?TrustRibbon 19:21, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
Yuri could've told me that... Charcoal121 22:09, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
It says rght on his page, I didn't think it needed to be pointed out O.o ЙураYuriKaslov - Sig image 22:21, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support - while honestly (and I must say this, as that's the point of an RfA) I don't envision Maxwell doing that much more in terms of the community side of the wiki (blog patrolling, banning, etc.), I do believe that Maxwell will be a superb choice for an admin here, especially considering that he has spent over half is time here editing the mainspace, and most of what's left on files, a fact that none of the admins here can match. The benefit that we'd have with Maxwell as an admin, to me, is too great to list on this RfA page.
  1. Redirect P043HeatedPete - 23:07, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support - I know Maxwell can handle it, i know he can you know why? he's down to earth on what he is doing, you have my back bro and i love Norway people Zephalian (Talk) 14:25, January 24, 2012 (UTC)


After 7 days, an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Successful

Bureaucrat action: Upgraded. Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) PresidentEden78 Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) 15:14, January 27, 2012 (UTC)

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

Pedro

1: Statements

  • If you are nominating somebody else on their behalf, fill in section 1.1. The nominee should then complete section 1.2.
  • If you are nominating yourself, ignore 1.1 and only complete 1.2


1.1: Nominator's Statement

Everyone knows Pedro Right? I'd say even though Maxwell has recently became admin but In my opinion, I think he is ready, should the Wiki feel like it's time then all I can say is that He would develop this Wiki to new heights/steps Zephalian (Talk) 09:49, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

Nomination accepted. Thanks for it :) -Pedro9basket (talk) [ Trusted User Editor Award ]



1.2: Nominee's Statement

(This section should only be completed by the nominee)

If a user is nominated by another user, the nominee must accept the nomination. Briefly summarize why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. You may also wish to consider the following questions when writing your statement:

  1. How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?
  2. When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images) and which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would either of these change?


I tend to visit the Wiki every day (except exam timelines, kind of like right now :P). My main namespace has been Mainspace for a while, workin on revamps on pages through my ".txt" works offline and in my sandbox, so that I could showcase all articles set in one piece in one edit, having the best efficiency possible on it. I also review the majority of the mainspace articles to see if they always meet the criteria in BF:CLASS, and either change it, nominate it for Bronze/Silver/Gold or tag them for Deletion, getting to use once the Unclassified category through URL.
If I get to admin, I'll work on a bigger dedication on the Wiki's mainspace (finishing articles that I'm still working on, etc.), as well as start a review of the files uploaded to the wiki, taking attention on the licensing of each of them (kind of like Bond and SSD did in the past).
I have all said, it's down now to the Wiki's community to say their thoughts. :) -Pedro9basket (talk) [ Trusted User Editor Award ] 14:22, March 7, 2012 (UTC)


2: Statistics

The following is for an admin to add:

As of January 1, 2011 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs)
  • Total edits: 3674 (Using Special:Editcount)
    • Of which 655 (17.83%) are in the mainspace
    • Of which 2451 (66.7%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: ~75 (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of stating precisely without counting manually)
    • Upload rating: (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
      • Good - Most images are of good quality, few have been deleted, and almost all of them were properly licensed.
  • Total blocks: 0 (Using Special:Log)
    • Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: March 29, 2011 (according to userpage header)
Signature of assessing admin: - ЙураYuriKaslov - Sig image 16:09, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

3: Voting


Support: 7
Oppose: 1
  • Support - As nomination Zephalian (Talk) 21:28, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Strong suport - After rethinking my opinion. He deserves it, while his actions on "that" wiki were unaceptable, however thats a different story.----Mobius patchSlopijoeHangarsMobius patch 20:59, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support - Frankly, we need another admin right now. Maxwell and I are rather sporadic in our activity, DG's not that active, leaving only Yuri who is active, alongside PE as a b'crat. So, in light of this, And the fact that we've been saying that Pedro'd be the next logical choice, I give my support to his nomination. Also, Zeph... vote.
  1. Redirect P043HeatedPete - 16:07, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Very weak support - I was rather torn on this one. Unlike HP, I never stated, either explicitly or implicitly, that you would get the next admin slot; in fact, I had an order as to who would be nominated (I was discussing it with HP a while back, if he remembers, on BLog), and my feelings were that 3R should get it, and then you. This is exacerbated by the hugely disproportionate edit percentages and edit count; close to 2/3rds of your edits are in the "useless" spaces, and that doesn't normally bode well for any attempt at adminship. Additionally, one of my big concerns is your activity; more than once I've had people tell me you troll (or perhaps, trolled) the CoD wiki, and I've seen you can be rather harsh and can be verbally abusive towards other users on the wiki. However, HP does bring up an important point, and that's the lack of active administrators (contrary to what Tywin says, there's legitimately only two active admins, as HP said; DG, CruzDude, Bond, SSD, and Richtofen are all inactive, while HP and Maxwell are both rather sporadic. In the words of SSD, I am of the opinion that anybody who deserves adminship should get it). Soon, BF3 DLCs and such are going to be released, and we will need more admins. And even in spite of how I've seen you act, you know, understand, and follow the policies very amicably. You've also been a good friend. All in all, I'm supporting your bid for adminship. On that note, I'm probably going to nominate 3R for adminship at some point today or tomorrow. ЙураYuriKaslov - Sig image 16:28, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
    • Comment - In question about the CoD Wiki, honestly, I simply found to say my opinion on it, wheter how much controversial they found to be. In troll's meaning, it's stated that a troll has the intention of baiting other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion, which was never the case intended. They disagree, fine, but trolling (which I remember Charcoal itself calling it that when I stated my supportive opinion on Treyarch, which was in a timeline when Treyarch was under flak in the Wiki) is what I found as an overstatement; I don't remember seeing myself going all "uMAD" or anything when people disagreed, much less did I intended to cause emotional response and/or disrupt on-topic discussion. -Pedro9basket (talk) [ Trusted User Editor Award ] 17:50, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
      • Comment - No, while you did offer your opinion about 3arc and IW, you said some pretty nasty things about IW and Respawn, which included saying you hated them. I went over the line as well, but I'm not the one asking to be an administrator. Charcoal121 18:10, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
        • Comment - If anything, I stated I didn't properly like ActiVision (maybe in an 'angry mode' or something, was quite some BS happening) about the W&Z and IWEG part, never stroke IW directly for the record lol. Anyways, that was quite some time ago IIRC, even before moving in to this Wiki (which was almost one year ago). Pedro9basket (talk) [ Trusted User Editor Award ] 18:22, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Even though I have seen him contribute positively to the wiki, he doesn't have many mainspace edits, and I remember it only being mere months ago when he said some rather controversial things on the CoDWiki. Charcoal121 16:53, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
    • Comment - As I placed on my statement, I work most of the time on article re-structuring and what not in .txt and on my sandbox. With that in place, I turned up articles to their best, while counted as just 1-5 edits total per page, like in Suez Canal, Sidi Power Plant, Camp Gibraltar (althought H2 worked on the pictures of it), Port Bavaria, creation and writting of Badges, created a sole page for Ribbons and placed in BF2142's info (although still lacks BF2, which is what I'm working on ATM, as well as Ribbons), among other things (without mentioning that I said on the statement that what I mostly do is review mainspace articles to see if they're rated correctly following the criteria of BF:CLASS). So yeah, I can have such number of edits, but I tried to be the most efficient possible in each of them (except the minor edits, which as rare for me in general). When it comes to the "controversial" things in the CoD Wiki, check my comment above ;) -Pedro9basket (talk) [ Trusted User Editor Award ] 17:50, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
      • Coment - Charcoal your Arguement is terrible.
      • First off, that happened on an other wiki and if it happened on this wiki we wouldn't be here.
      • Secondly Most of his edits are from his sandbox and after he is done he makes one huge edit.

--Mobius patchSlopijoeHangarsMobius patch 20:59, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

  • Strong Support - Shit, I keep missing stuff here... Damn Mass Effect 3 and school and such...
Anyways, I remember how eager Pedro was when he first joined this wiki, and I haven't seen that eagerness stop. Hes been a wonderful editor and a good friend here. And with H2seasprite, he's been instrumental in gathering knowledge on BF2142 after having been taught the ways of the custom-built computer. As per Yuri (and by extent, SSD), I feel he deserves an upgrade to adminship. Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) PresidentEden78 Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) 00:01, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support - Sorry for the late vote here, but I just thought about it and decided to give a Support vote. Why? Because Pedro here encouraged me to become a TU and now an Admin! So, I should return the favor. While his mainspace edits are lighter than "other" edits, he still has made an impact on the wiki with his careful testing on the sandbox and then putting it all to good use. I don't really care for what he did on the COD Wiki because I probably might not be welcomed there at all and if I did, then I'd be capable of doing nothing there. Back on topic, I say he should be an admin. 3rd Ranger New Orders - Edit At Will Newcomer&#039;s Ribbon TrustRibbon UserMonthRibbon 00:21, March 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support - Per nomination. He has been the one spearheading the 2142 article effort. He definitely is ready for adminship. H2seaspriteSig h2seaspriteBlahBlahBlahContribs Editor Award 21:15, March 14, 2012 (UTC)


After 7 days, an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Successful!

Bureaucrat action: Promoted! Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) PresidentEden78 Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) 03:41, March 16, 2012 (UTC)

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

3RDRANGER

1: Statements

  • If you are nominating somebody else on their behalf, fill in section 1.1. The nominee should then complete section 1.2.
  • If you are nominating yourself, ignore 1.1 and only complete 1.2


1.1: Nominator's Statement

  • Although 3RDRANGER is a relatively new addition to the wiki's retinue, in his half-year tenure he's made massive contributions, consistently, for the entire time he has been here -- and even before that as an anon, as I and some others convinced him to create an account. Although he initially demonstrated a lack of knowledge on our policies and such, he's very quickly learned. His edits are always of high quality and consistency, and his images are good. He's made great contributions on the file space. He's also just generally a nice guy, and I've no doubts he'd make a great addition to the administrative team. At this rate he's liable to overtake SSD in edits by the time the year's out. ЙураYuriKaslov - Sig image 19:08, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

I accept the nomination. 3rd Ranger New Orders - Edit At Will Newcomer&#039;s Ribbon TrustRibbon UserMonthRibbon 20:38, March 8, 2012 (UTC)


1.2: Nominee's Statement

(This section should only be completed by the nominee)

If a user is nominated by another user, the nominee must accept the nomination. Briefly summarize why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. You may also wish to consider the following questions when writing your statement:

  1. How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?
  2. When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images) and which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would either of these change?


  • I like to visit the wiki every night or in the afternoon when I don't have school. In the future, it might stay the same, maybe in the July to August, I'll edit more often. When I visit the wiki, I like to edit in articles, comment on blog posts, and occasionally add pictures. If I become admin, I might close nominations and hand out awards, block editors not willing to follow the rules, and protect pages if the need arises. 3rd Ranger New Orders - Edit At Will Newcomer&#039;s Ribbon TrustRibbon UserMonthRibbon 20:38, March 8, 2012 (UTC)


2: Statistics

The following is for an admin to add:

As of March 8, 2012 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs)
  • Total edits: 4280 (Using Special:Editcount)
    • Of which 1781 (41.61%) are in the mainspace
    • Of which 1334 (31.16%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: ~600 (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of stating precisely without counting manually)
    • Upload rating: (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
      • Excellent - Most of his images are properly licensed, and most of them are of good quality.
  • Total blocks: 0 (Using Special:Log)
    • Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: September 13, 2011 (according to userpage header)
Signature of assessing admin: - ЙураYuriKaslov - Sig image 19:08, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

3: Voting


Support: 7
Oppose: 0
  • Support - Per my nom, he'd be a great admin. ЙураYuriKaslov - Sig image 19:08, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Strong Support - Per Yuri. Charcoal121 19:14, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Very Strong Support - Very nice guy, very active and he's turning onto a bot like big Max lol. Supported you onto becoming a TU, going to do same here. No better addition! Per nomination. Pedro9basket (talk) [ Trusted User Editor Award ] 19:16, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support - Since he got his TU upgrade recently, the main person I've seen editing pages in the actvity feed is 3RDRANGER (not to say he hasn't been a great editor in the past, but I only started noticing nearly every page edit is by him, lol). Some are simple, others more complex - and his edit count has reached a staggering level for such a short time of barely six months. We need people like 3RDRANGER that can just go on edit sprees. Upgrading him to an admin can only further improve his ability to expand the wiki. Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) PresidentEden78 Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) 00:11, March 8, 2012 (UTC)

Chuck Norris Support - Double Admins in one day ftw Zephalian (Talk) 00:14, March 8, 2012 (UTC)

  • Support - 3RDR seems to be a very apt user, being very new to the wiki comparatively but having learnt a helluva lot of stuff in his limited time. He's almost always the one guy who is editing his socks off, knows his way around most Wikia features and is a real benefit to the wiki mainspace. Considering that we only really have two admins - PE and Yuri - that are active on a common basis, we need a boost in terms of numbers, and 3RDR is a prime choice for an admin spot. I give the nomination my unequivocal support, considering he's basically gonna be replacing me as an admin. Damned A-Levels...
  1. Redirect P043HeatedPete - 20:13, March 8, 2012 (UTC)


After 7 days, an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Successful!

Bureaucrat action: Promoted! Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) PresidentEden78 Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) 03:41, March 16, 2012 (UTC)

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

Zephalian


1.2: Nominee's Statement

(This section should only be completed by the nominee)

If a user is nominated by another user, the nominee must accept the nomination. Briefly summarize why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. You may also wish to consider the following questions when writing your statement:

  1. How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?
  2. When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images) and which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would either of these change?

It's probably too early, but even though there are two other successful Rfa's. I think I should give it a shot and NO Yuri and PE and Pete I'm not going to end up like TheManofIron CRITICISM ALL ACCEPTED, FEEL FREE TO VENT YOUR SPLEEN as I am learning form this experience ok here goes.

I think that, with me being admin I can like any editor, develop, recreate and if not Innovate the wiki. My grammar i admit isn't the best but I kinda make it up for my Images, trailer articles whatever, as long it has to do with.

I visit the Wiki usually everyday, and I try to be as active as much as possible I can say I even edit during school times when im not supposed to haha, Yeah when I visit I usually check the blogs out, talk page with my fellow wiki friends, I sometimes just update templates and images when there is a new trailer or screenshots and finally If I was an admin I would probably have to edit on the mainspace more usual.



2: Statistics

The following is for an admin to add:

As of March 19, 2012 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs)
  • Total edits: 2109 (Using Special:Editcount)
    • Of which 604 (28%) are in the mainspace
    • Of which 300 (14%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: ~600 (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of stating precisely without counting manually)
    • Upload rating: (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
      • Good - Most of his pictures are of good quality and have been licensed and few have been deleted.
  • Total blocks: 0 (Using Special:Log)
    • Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: July 15, 2011 (according to userpage header)
Signature of assessing admin: 3rd Ranger New Orders - Edit At Will Newcomer&#039;s Ribbon TrustRibbon UserMonthRibbon 22:47, March 19, 2012 (UTC)

3: Voting


Support: 3
Oppose: 3
  • Support - From what I remember, Zeph is a committed editor and an asset to the wiki. I imagine upgrading him will only be of benefit - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 20:02, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose - While Zeph's actions are indeed good. However I think someone else should take the position.--Mobius patchSlopijoeHangarsMobius patch 20:12, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support - Even though this request may have came too early with the other admin requests that have been given just recently, I'm sure he would make a fine admin. Charcoal121 22:45, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
  • Strong Support - Well, let me think. He's been in this wiki longer than me and his initial edits violated BF:LEAK, but somehow he's been doing good for the past few months and if he keeps on abiding by the policies enforced here and edits frequently (maybe not as frequently as me), then he'll make one hell of a good admin. 3rd Ranger New Orders - Edit At Will Newcomer&#039;s Ribbon TrustRibbon UserMonthRibbon 22:50, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
  • Pending - I'm not very sure about this. Before your "semi-retirement", he was far more active than he is now, having made almost 2,000 edits from July to late December. Now, he just increased it to 2,121 in the duration of 3 months, which concerns me about your inactivity, and concerns me a lot, thinking about how your activity will be, that has been kind of sporadic here and in your Battlefield Fan Fiction Wiki. Alongside that, PE78 requested you to help get the Featured Content back up and running, which you didn't participate that much on it, really. Due to the fact of these, alongside that there are users quite more active than you, and the fact that I and 3RDRANGER have become admins just one week ago, makes me believe I'll have to Oppose you. But, for now, I'll just leave it Pending to see your arguments against the statement I just wrote, or from other users. Pedro9basket (talk) [ AdminRibbon Editor Award ] 23:48, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
    • Thinking long about this, and I believe there are guys like Slopijoe who not only are more active, they are in this Wiki far longer than you (more 11 months than you, in this case) and I honestly don't think you're ready yet, so I Oppose. Sorry, lad. - Pedro9basket (talk) [ AdminRibbon Editor Award ] 16:04, March 27, 2012 (UTC)
  • Reply to Pedro - Oppose if you want, I'm just saying yeah the timing is a bit off two new admins at once, just giving it a shot and yeah my edits been sporadic but im regaining my momentum Zephalian (Dossier) (Briefing) 05:21, March 22, 2012 (UTC)
    • Comment - Honestly, a RfA should take place when the momentum is gained, rather than when the activity is still in question..... - Pedro9basket (talk) [ AdminRibbon Editor Award ] 08:30, March 22, 2012 (UTC)
    • Comment - I didn't catch that, What did you mean? Zephalian (Dossier) (Briefing) 09:27, March 22, 2012 (UTC)
      • I meant you probably should make your RfA when your activity is established rather than when you're "regaining your momentum". I'm not sure if you'll keep up with this activity and again, there are users more active than you ATM. - Pedro9basket (talk) [ AdminRibbon Editor Award ] 11:52, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

Comment I agree, I have to be more active so Im considering putting this on Hiatus Zephalian (Dossier) (Briefing) 13:05, March 22, 2012 (UTC) Comment What's the update? Zephalian (Dossier) (Briefing) 07:12, March 25, 2012 (UTC)

  • Oppose - I dunno, you really haven't been that active as of late, which is why I don't feel comfortable supporting you. ЙураYuriKaslov - Sig image 16:54, March 27, 2012 (UTC)
  • Agreement - Im gonna cancel this vote Zephalian (Dossier) (Briefing) 09:24, March 29, 2012 (UTC)
    • With that statement, it seems that you want to cancel your nomination. Are you sure of it? - Pedro9basket (talk) [ AdminRibbon Editor Award ] 09:40, March 29, 2012 (UTC)


After 7 days, an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Unsuccessful - Cancelled by nominee.

Bureaucrat action:

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

Slopijoe

1: Statements

  • If you are nominating somebody else on their behalf, fill in section 1.1. The nominee should then complete section 1.2.
  • If you are nominating yourself, ignore 1.1 and only complete 1.2


1.1: Nominator's Statement

  • I've known Slopijoe (hereafter referred to as Tywin) for a while now, and he's become one of my closer wiki-friends; although he can be somewhat out-of-line at times, he has come a long way since joining, and I'm of the opinion that he has matured quite a bit. He's had a few bad incidents, but if he just worked on that I believe he'd make one of our better admins. He's no SSD, but he's still a good guy at heart. He's also one of our senior members and has a good grasp on wiki policy.
    So it's with great pleasure that I nominate Tywin for the position of administrator on the Battlefield wiki.
    ЙураYuriKaslov - Sig image 02:28, July 8, 2012 (UTC)


1.2: Nominee's Statement

(This section should only be completed by the nominee)

If a user is nominated by another user, the nominee must accept the nomination. Briefly summarize why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. You may also wish to consider the following questions when writing your statement:

  1. How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?
  2. When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images) and which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would either of these change?


  • I mainly visit this wiki and check on it once every thirty minutes. I mainly check user edits, comment on blogs and undo vandals if present (via rollback). I also edit templates, add info or remove false or unnecessary info from pages. I mainly edit the older Battlefield games such as BF1942 and BFV. I also add pictures to vehicle, weapons and Medal/Awards from past to present BF games.
  • If im Admin, it will not effect my editing much. Rather I can block vandals instead of silently undoing them and keep the wiki up to date on things such as patches, news ect.


2: Statistics

The following is for an admin to add:

As of January 1, 2011 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs)
  • Total edits: 3120 (Using Special:Editcount)
    • Of which 1125 (36%) are in the mainspace
    • Of which 1742 (55%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: ~50 - 120 (Using Special:Log - Tywin's uploaded a lot of images, but I've no way to figure out how many considering that he's also edited file details)
    • Upload rating: (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
      • Good - Haven't seen too many problems with his uploads, at least not so far as I remember.
  • Total blocks: 2 (Using Special:Log)
    • Totalling a block time of 6 days
  • Active since: June 17, 2010 (according to userpage header)
Signature of assessing admin: ЙураYuriKaslov - Sig image 02:28, July 8, 2012 (UTC)

3: Voting


Support: 7
Oppose: 2
  • Support - (still) As nominator. ЮраYuriKaslov - Sig image 02:28, July 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Due to Tywin's recent actions, I believe he shouldn't be put in a position of power until he proves he can handle these situations in a mature way, and not bring his and Ramp's issues unto the Wiki. Charcoal121 (talk) 03:55, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
  • Neutral - Tywin and I did have that litte...um...episode, I guess. Anyways I think that tywin and I have recovered and that nothing else will be happening (bad, at least). Tywin is still a good editor thought and if he can prove that he can handle things, he should have the admin flags.Flag of the United States Rampantlion513 Wanna Talk? What I have done 04:26, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Due to recent events F-22 Desert Raptor156th Tactical Fighter SquadronDEathgod65 - OMDF (Contact) VMFA-55F-35A RSAF
  • Support - Last Minute change I guess but yeah hopefully Slopi's gonna learn from this, Yeah like I SAID previously, He deserves this and would make a fine admin. Zephalian (Dossier) (Briefing) 01:45, July 21, 2012 (UTC)
  • Strong Support - Despite the shenanigans that he and Ramp got into, I still firmly believe Joe is ready to become an admin. Even behind his block, he tried to help out the wiki. Either by being anonymous to revert edits, or through telling Maxwell to make changes in his place, Joe still helped out.
    Normally, this wouldn't be the best of things to happen as he did circumvent his block, but it shows that perhaps it was unnecessary for him if he still meant to do well. And we certainly can't let recent events be the sole reason that Joe doesn't become an admin when he's been an excellent editor here for over two years.
    Everyone has their bad days, and he and Ramp just happened to have one at a very bad time. Yes, things could have gone differently, but there's no point in arguing that. The forum thing was to try and figure out the problem that occurred between the two, since it became a multi-wiki problem, but not because of Joe's actions.
    Joe deserves the promotion regardless. He's worked hard for it, and one fluke shouldn't kill the whole thing. Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) PresidentEden78 Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) 21:23, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support - Per PE. It's usual to look on a user's past and see in hindsight what he could do in certain cirumstances (for instance, as an admin), but if we all look onto his conduct and what not, you can see it's expected far more good than bad in Tywin's future. With that said, I think he still deserves his chance as an admin, and I believe he'll make a great one, being one the oldest active editors around here, and probably the best Trusted User at the moment. - Pedro9basket (talk) [ AdminRibbon Editor Award ] 23:21, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support - Yes, why should Tywin have his chance to be an admin jeopardized just because of one bad action? Has he done anything else bad other than the "debacle" with Rampantlion? Not really. Tywin probably won't do anything else bad again if he became an admin, so I give my support to him. 3rd Ranger New Orders - Edit At Will Newcomer&#039;s Ribbon TrustRibbon UserMonthRibbon 21:10, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support - Per Eden, despite Joe's actions between him and Ramp I still believe he should earn Adminship because of his hard work around the wiki. We can't let him lose this chance because of a recent action, he'll make sure it won't happen again. Flag of the Soviet UnionAngel of AnarchyговоритьBF1942 DP ICON
  • (Weak) Support - Looks like I'm a bit late, but since it's not been archived yet I guess I'll add my view anyway. While I've obviously not been here of late to get a real feel for what's happened recently (I've managed to skim-read the basics of the Rampantlion incident), I think I can justify supporting this. While his past blocks and troubles worry me, I think he has, on the whole, matured and improved so I see no reason why that should prompt an oppose from me. However, bearing all that in mind, I'm offering a weak support... - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 17:16, July 25, 2012 (UTC)
ps. The dispute mentioned above seems like it was dealt with efficiently and professionally by the admin team - well done! Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 20:26, July 25, 2012 (UTC)


After 7 days, an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Successful!

Bureaucrat action: Promoted. Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) PresidentEden78 Enclave Symbol (Fallout 3) 18:14, July 30, 2012 (UTC)

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

PSKwhirled

1: Statements

1.1: Nominator's Statement

  • The guy is dedicated, on frequently, is very personable, and is generally quite good with editing. He's one of the most well-known users among our active ones. I also intended to nominate him a while back but I forgot about it.


1.2: Nominee's Statement

(This section should only be completed by the nominee)

If a user is nominated by another user, the nominee must accept the nomination. Briefly summarize why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. You may also wish to consider the following questions when writing your statement:

  1. How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?
  2. When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images) and which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would either of these change?



  1. As an editor, I visit everyday. I don't edit regularly, but I edit often. As Admin, I see myself editing more in that I'd be deleting when it was nedeed. Regular editing would not change.
  2. When I log on, I always check the recent activity. Occasionally I check uploads to see of they are licensed, but I so far have only done it irregularly. As an Admin, I'd probably be checking the upload log much more frequently even though I plan on it already anyway.
  • On a side note, there are a couple things I couldn't license due to the source being noted as spam; however, I was planning on deleting them anyway. PSKwhirled Talk Work

2: Statistics

The following is for an admin to add:

As of March 26, 2013 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs)
  • Total edits: 1058 (Using Special:Editcount)
    • Of which 722 (68.24%) are in the mainspace
    • Of which 130 (11.98%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: ~30 (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of stating precisely without counting manually)
    • Upload rating: (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
      • Excellent - I don't think he's ever forgotten to license images, or if he did he fixed it.
  • Total blocks: 0 (Using Special:Log)
    • Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: April 21, 2012 (according to userpage header)
Signature of assessing admin: ЮраYuriKaslov - Sig image 23:30, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

3: Voting


Support: 8
Oppose: 0
  • Support - As nominator. ЮраYuriKaslov - Sig image 23:30, March 26, 2013 (UTC)
  • Support - PSK is a good contributor to this wiki and deserves the nomination so he can further support our community. Charcoal121 (talk) 23:43, March 26, 2013 (UTC)
  • Support - PSK has been an excellent contributer to this Wiki, and has proven himself time and time again to be fit for such a responsibility. --

Spas12combatXtremegiancaAltBoomSPAS12 00:30, March 27, 2013 (UTC)

  • Support - He contribute and keep the site & articles in shape with trustworthy information.
    Maxwell123 (talk) 13:35, March 27, 2013 (UTC)
  • Support - Appears to be a trusted and accomplished editor --Callofduty4 (talk) 13:16, April 6, 2013 (UTC)


After 7 days, an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: successful

Bureaucrat action: promoted by User:3RDRANGER

</div>

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

YuriKaslov (Bureaucrat)

Section 1

Nominator's Statement: In a few sentences, summarise why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. (This section should be completed by the nominator, if you are nominating somebody else, you should complete this section about the editor you are nominating, and the nominee should briefly state that they accept the nomination.)

Well, Yuri has been on this wiki for a long time, even longer than me. He's a pretty friendly and trustworthy guy and has done good mainspace edits for this wiki. He's been an Admin on this wiki for a pretty long time, and I think it's finally time he gets promoted. Also, I must say that this wiki needs more than one active Bureaucrat around in case one of them is inactive for a few days or so, and the work can't all be put on one person to do them. I'd be happy for Yuri to help me out in my duty as a Bureaucrat of the Battlefield Wiki by nominating and (hopefully) promoting him to that position.

75 Ranger Regiment Coat Of Arms Rangers Lead The Way Ranger Tab 18:56, June 2, 2013 (UTC)


I accept the nomination. ЮраYuriKaslov - Sig image 20:37, June 2, 2013 (UTC)


Section 2

Please answer the following questions honestly and as fully as you can in the space provided. This section should only be completed by the nominee.

1) How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?

A: I'm on at least once per day. I am almost always available, and I do not foresee much fluxtuation in my activity levels.

2) When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images)?

A: Depends. Recently I've been working more on the main space, but I also patrol the recent changes.

3) Which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an adminb'crat, would this change?

A: As of late I've been editing more main space articles. Chances are this would not change as a direct result of bureaucrat flags.

Thank you. Please stay tuned to take part in the debate, which may include further questioning.

Section 3

The following is for an admin to add: (don't worry, they are all 0 until updated)

As of June 2, 2013 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs)
Of which 2465 (33.86%) are in the mainspace
Of which 2082 (28.59%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: 381 (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of counting precisely without doing it manually)
Upload rating: Good - Ignoring his latest uploaded pictures, his pictures have good quality and are fully licensed. Not to mention the theme we have right now was uploaded by Yuri. (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: May 13, 2010 (according to userpage header)

Voting

Vote below using:

*'''Support''' - Reason - ~~~~
*'''Oppose''' - Reason - ~~~~
*Comment/Question - ~~~~

Support - As nominator. 75 Ranger Regiment Coat Of Arms Rangers Lead The Way Ranger Tab 18:56, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

Support - I believe Yuri should become a bureaucrat due to his long-time loyalty to the wiki and good personality, two essential qualities for a good crat. As the one of the users encouraging Yuri to have someone nominate him for bureaucrat, it is obvious I will support him.

BFBC2 UMP45 ICONX-AltClickBF3 G53 ICON

Support - He's dedicated to the wikia and is EXTREMELY ACTIVE! He upholds the Wikias policys and is a good guy. B-Crat, Yes -- awyman13 {Talk} {Work} 19:52, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

Support - As a long time friend and mentor for quite a few topics on Wikia, I strongly give my support to this, not to mention his constant overwatch as an administrator. PSKwhirled Talk Work

Support - I don't see any reason why not. He's a dedicated member of this wiki and we do need more b'crats.

BFBC2 XM8 Compact ICONDICEpwn7Meds hereXM8AR Large P4F 21:17, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

Support - Very active, friendly, dedicated, to-the-point, and keeps the Wiki's policies enforced. BF3 KH2002 ICONPLR SoldierFlag of Iran 21:23, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

Support - Yuri is a good user and a good friend. His activity and contribution to this is well. I do believe he'll make a great Bureaucrat, I don't see why not. Flag of the Soviet UnionAngel of AnarchyговоритьBF1942 DP ICON

Support - Yuri is a good user and enforcer of polices. The two most important features of a bureaucrat. --Light Em Up (talk) 23:29, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

Support- I known Yuri for around three years and known him since well, my entire wikian career to all honesty while he may have faults, he deserves it.--Imperial German flagSlopijoeheil dir im siegerkranzImperial German flag06:42, June 3, 2013 (UTC)

Support - Yuri has been an important conttributor to this wiki, and is deserving of being upgraded to a bureaucrat. Charcoal121 (talk) 13:49, June 3, 2013 (UTC)

Comment - Ok since its 10-0 Im declaring I'm calling for uninamious vote in the effort to save time and money. --Imperial German flagSlopijoeheil dir im siegerkranzImperial German flag 13:52, June 3, 2013 (UTC)

Support - I could write an entire essay explaining why and how much Yuri deserves this, but the unanimous support on this RfB as of now says it in better words that what I could ever do. Wheter the Wiki needs one more b'crat or not is a bit irrelevant; not only a helping hand takes off some pressure from the rest (which right now is only one), but he has enough merit to take the extra responsability and, as I said before, it is definetly deserved. Well done, lad! :) - Pedro9basket (talk) [ AdminRibbon Editor Award ] 00:50, June 4, 2013 (UTC)

Results

After 7 days, an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Support: 11

Oppose: 0

Result: Successful

Bureaucrat action: Promoted to Bureaucrat! 75 Ranger Regiment Coat Of Arms Rangers Lead The Way Ranger Tab 22:36, June 4, 2013 (UTC)

</div>

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

PLR Soldier

1: Statements

  • If you are nominating somebody else on their behalf, fill in section 1.1. The nominee should then complete section 1.2.
  • If you are nominating yourself, ignore 1.1 and only complete 1.2


1.1: Nominator's Statement

(This section should be completed by the nominator, if nominating somebody else. If you are self-nominating, ignore this section and proceed to section 1.2)

In a few sentences, summarize why you think the nominee is suitable for the role of an administrator.


1.2: Nominee's Statement

(This section should only be completed by the nominee)

If a user is nominated by another user, the nominee must accept the nomination. Briefly summarize why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. You may also wish to consider the following questions when writing your statement:

  1. How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?
  2. When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images) and which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would either of these change?


  1. After a few years, and much learning in the process, I feel the time is right. A couple of months ago, I was offered the position of Trusted User. Since then, I have adapted to a role of keeping the Wiki free of vandalism and the like, in tandem with the normal editing I usually do. I visit two to three times per day, edit fairly regularly, and see myself editing more and more as we near the launch of Battlefield 4, and well into post-launch (and of course, future titles). As an Administrator, I see myself furthering the privilege of anti-vandalism and maintaining of the Battlefield Wiki policy.
  2. When I log in, I check all of the Recent Activity since my last log in. I check for vandalism, grammar, and verify information/trivia edits. I greet any new users, letting them know that if they ever need help, they can talk to me. I check all image uploads to see if it has been licensed properly, and, if not, remind the uploader to be sure to properly license their images. I see myself maintaining this behavior as an Administrator.


2: Statistics

The following is for an admin to add:

As of January 1, 2011 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs)
  • Total edits: 1921 (Using Special:Editcount)
    • Of which 1287 (67%) are in the mainspace
    • Of which 111 (~6%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: ~300 (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of stating precisely without counting manually)
    • Upload rating: (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
      • Excellent - I don't believe there are a significant number of unlicensed images uploaded by him.
  • Total blocks: 0 (Using Special:Log)
    • Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: October 30, 2011 (according to userpage header)
Signature of assessing admin: ЮраYuriKaslov - Sig image 21:25, August 10, 2013 (UTC)

3: Voting


Support: 6
Oppose: 0
  • Yes. As a active and well-rounded user, I have no reason to argue otherwise. PSKwhirled Talk Work
  • PLR Soldier has shown that he can keep this wiki stable: activeness, edits, attitude towards

other users. There's almost nothing against him being Admin. Flag of the Soviet UnionAngel of AnarchyговоритьBF1942 DP ICON

  • Mmmm let me think about it.... Hell ya! Always on, always good conduct, always awesome! :) awyman13FandomStaff.png (Talk/Work)
  • A great guy always making great edits and helping with any and almost all questions asked. Helped myself quite alot as well! JackHags. 06:24, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
  • As per PSK, Jack, Awyman and AoA, he has shown excellent conduct. BFBC2 UMP45 ICONX-AltClickBF3 G53 ICON
  • PLR Soldier is a pretty nice guy and he is an active user who has done useful edits at times. That's a yes vote from me. 75 Ranger Regiment Coat Of Arms Rangers Lead The Way Ranger Tab 23:35, August 12, 2013 (UTC)

Results

After 7 days, an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Successful

Bureaucrat action: Promoted! 75 Ranger Regiment Coat Of Arms Rangers Lead The Way Ranger Tab 01:47, August 14, 2013 (UTC)

</div>

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.