FANDOM


SlopijoeEdit

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

1: Statements

  • If you are nominating somebody else on their behalf, fill in section 1.1. The nominee should then complete section 1.2.
  • If you are nominating yourself, ignore 1.1 and only complete 1.2


1.1: Nominator's Statement

(This section should be completed by the nominator, if nominating somebody else. If you are self-nominating, ignore this section and proceed to section 1.2)

In a few sentences, summarize why you think the nominee is suitable for the role of an administrator.


1.2: Nominee's Statement

(This section should only be completed by the nominee)

If a user is nominated by another user, the nominee must accept the nomination. Briefly summarize why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. You may also wish to consider the following questions when writing your statement:

  1. How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?
  • I edit this wikia from time to time, majority of the times I undo edits and work with the old weapons on BF games, my wikia time will remain the same. Despite my growing schedule due to school, I still maintain status quo here.
  1. When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images) and which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would either of these change?
  • I mostly revamp the maps for older Battlefield maps such as 1942, nam or BF2. Though its harder then some might expect, its still worthwhile to note them and have them complete.


2: Statistics

The following is for an admin to add:

As of January 1, 2011 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs)
  • Total edits: 4656 (Using Special:Editcount)
    • Of which 1941 (41.69%) are in the mainspace
    • Of which 2715 (58.31%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: ~200 (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of stating precisely without counting manually)
    • Upload rating: (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
      • Average - Some of his more recent files have no licensing, otherwise okay.
  • Total blocks: 6 days (Using Special:Log)
    • Totalling a block time of 144 hours
  • Active since: June 20, 2010 (according to userpage header)
Signature of assessing admin: ЮраYuriKaslov - Sig image 22:12, August 28, 2013 (UTC)

3: Voting


Support: 6
Oppose: 0
  • Support - I've known Tywin for some years and I consider him to be among my best wiki-friends. I put a lot of trust in him -- while he does often make a game out of issues (drawing parallels to politics, mostly) he knows the rules and I trust him to make the right judgment in the end. He's been an administrator for a while, as well, and is admin/bcrat on several other wikis and hence already knows the ropes. ЮраYuriKaslov - Sig image 22:12, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
  • Support - Tywin is one of the most responsible and straight-forward wikia users I know. I have no doubt in my mind that Joe will be a great bureaucrat for this wiki.
  • Support - Tywin knows exactly what hes doing and talking about. Dont see why not. -- Seal of the US Air Force awyman13 Talk Work 23:21, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
  • Support - To the fullest extent; Tywin is truly something else. He helped me in my early days on here, and thanks to him, I have flourished. He has, from what I have heard, had unfortunate experiences in the past, but that is exactly where it belongs, we all have, we learn from them. He fits the attitude and experience of someone who deserves Bureaucrat status, and I have absolutely no doubts he will be an excellent one. For these reasons, and many more, I support. Flag of IranPLR SoldierTalkBF3 KH2002 ICON
  • Support - I've known Joe for quite some time now and he has been really good friend to me and to other users of this wiki. It's not only that, he's also shown me that he has the capability of being a Bureaucrat and shown that he has been a really great Admin. I really don't see anything how he can't be a Bureaucrat. Flag of the Soviet UnionAngel of AnarchyговоритьBF1942 DP ICON



After 7 days, an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Successful (unanimous vote)

Bureaucrat action: RFA closed, user promoted. ЮраYuriKaslov - Sig image 02:56, August 31, 2013 (UTC)

Awyman13Edit

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

1: Statements

  • If you are nominating somebody else on their behalf, fill in section 1.1. The nominee should then complete section 1.2.
  • If you are nominating yourself, ignore 1.1 and only complete 1.2


1.1: Nominator's Statement

(This section should be completed by the nominator, if nominating somebody else. If you are self-nominating, ignore this section and proceed to section 1.2)

In a few sentences, summarize why you think the nominee is suitable for the role of an administrator.


1.2: Nominee's Statement

(This section should only be completed by the nominee)

If a user is nominated by another user, the nominee must accept the nomination. Briefly summarize why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. You may also wish to consider the following questions when writing your statement:

  1. How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?
  • I visit the Wiki almost everyday and edit everytime I am visiting. This will of course change as I leave for basic training in the USAF but that will be a year from now and I do plan to return afterwards
  1. When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images) and which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would either of these change?
  • I do pretty much anything you can think of. Ill add new or edit old information, Ill upload and properly license pictures. I also Create Navboxes, templates, add categories where needed as well as reverting any vandalism. I am also big on updating the Wiki's news in blogs.


2: Statistics

The following is for an admin to add:

As of November 5, 2013 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs)
  • Total edits: 5,347 (Using Special:Editcount)
    • Of which 2,998 (56.07%) are in the mainspace
    • Of which 2,349 (43.93%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: ~400 (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of stating precisely without counting manually)
    • Upload rating: (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
      • Good - Images mostly seem to be of exceptional quality.
  • Total blocks: 0 (Using Special:Log)
    • Totaling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: June 10, 2010 (according to userpage header)
Signature of assessing admin: Flag of IranPLR SoldierTalkBF3 KH2002 ICON 17:08, November 5, 2013 (UTC)

3: Voting


Support: 3
Oppose: 0
  • Support - A great user, friend, and editor. He has proven himself through the many years he has been here, his edits are always for the betterment of the Wiki, and contributes heavily to the BF Wiki News. When I or the other admins are not around, I know for a fact that Awyman is there doing what needs to be done. It's an honor; and the least I can do. Support. :) Flag of IranPLR SoldierTalkBF3 KH2002 ICON 17:16, November 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • Support - Great authority-guy, gamemate, helper, pretty much a Jack of All. Bleh. -- Ha-HA! 01:19, November 6, 2013 (UTC)
  • Support - Clearly means well and is proving himself as an asset to the site. I think he should be given this chance... Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 17:16, November 10, 2013 (UTC)


After 7 days, an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Successful

Bureaucrat action: Upgraded - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 17:24, November 10, 2013 (UTC)

PLR Soldier (b'crat)Edit

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

1: Statements

You may also wish to consider the following questions when writing your statement:

  1. How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?
  2. When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images) and which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would either of these change?


  • Seeing that we now have no active Bureaucrats at the moment, I would like to nominate myself and see what the community wishes. By becoming a Bureaucrat, I will be continuing what I believe I do best: edit and maintain the integrity and order of the Battlefield Wiki.
  • I will do what I always do, check the Recent Activity, latest blogs, monitor for vandalism, make edits to pages, etc.


2: Statistics

The following is for an admin to add:

As of December 2, 2013 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs)
  • Total edits: 2735 (Using Special:Editcount)
    • Of which 1706 (62.38%) are in the mainspace
    • Of which 1029 (37.62%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: 200+ (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of stating precisely without counting manually)
    • Upload rating: (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
      • Excellent - All files licensed, quality of majority are good.
  • Total blocks: 0 (Using Special:Log)
    • Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: October 30, 2011 (according to userpage header)
  • Admin since: August 14, 2013

Signature of assessing admin: Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 17:06, December 3, 2013 (UTC)

3: Voting


Support: 2
Oppose: 0
  • Neutral Support - PLR's stats look good, and from what I've seen he would be good as a b'crat. However, I feel I cannot really support his nomination as I have not been around to see what he is like as an editor and an admin. In the time I have been back, PLR has showed himself to be a fully capable editor and admin, so I don't see why he shouldn't be upgraded - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 17:06, December 3, 2013 (UTC)
  • Support - As nominee. Flag of IranPLR SoldierTalkBF3 KH2002 ICON
Self-vote stuck out (rule revision) - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 01:36, December 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • Support - Ah what would we do with PLR -- awyman13FandomStaff.png (Talk/Work) 04:16, December 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • Neutral - Not supporting but not opposing. --Hyperborrean22 (talk) 16:43, December 5, 2013 (UTC)


This vote ends on December 7, at around midnight UTC. A neutral admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Successful

Bureaucrat action: Upgraded - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 21:27, December 7, 2013 (UTC)

Awyman13 (b'crat)Edit

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

1: Statements

You may also wish to consider the following questions when writing your statement:

  1. How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?
  2. When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images) and which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would either of these change?



2: Statistics

The following is for an admin to add:

As of December 2, 2013 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs)
  • Total edits: 6291 (Using Special:Editcount)
    • Of which 3301 (52.47%) are in the mainspace
    • Of which 623 (9.9%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: 400+ (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of stating precisely without counting manually)
    • Upload rating: (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
      • Good - Mostly licensed correctly, good quality.
  • Total blocks: 0 (Using Special:Log)
    • Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: June 10, 2010 (according to userpage header)
  • Admin since: November 10, 2013

Signature of assessing admin: Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 17:06, December 3, 2013 (UTC)

3: Voting


Support: 3
Oppose: 1
  • Oppose for now (nothing personal) Support. Awyman is making an excellent admin and fully deserves his current position. I would have recommend him getting more experience as an admin before becoming a b'crat, but he is the most active of the current admins, has a huge base of contributions already and has loads of ideas. I think he'd make a great b'crat - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 17:06, December 3, 2013 (UTC)
  • Support - He is vital to the Wiki, always has been. He'll make an even better B'crat. Flag of IranPLR SoldierTalkBF3 KH2002 ICON
  • Oppose Sorry (Nothing personal, you seem to be a good admin, Awy) but he just needs more time to settle in before boldly going in (he is no 3RD..). It seems like we are on a trail for a ton of active BCrats, two is enough IMHO. BFBC2 UMP45 ICONX-AltClickBF3 G53 ICON
  • Support I feel Awy would make a good B'crat although maybe someone else should be elected as well just in case. --Hyperborrean22 (talk) 16:45, December 5, 2013 (UTC)


This vote ends on December 7, at around midnight UTC. A neutral admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Successful

Bureaucrat action: Upgraded - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 21:27, December 7, 2013 (UTC)

PSKwhirled (b'crat)Edit

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

1: Statements

In a few sentences, summarize why you think the nominee is suitable for the role of an administrator.

This vote is taking place in special circumstances. PSK was upgraded to b'crat before Slopijoe announced his intention to retire. Doing so without a vote was beyond Slopijoe's remit.
The alternative to holding this vote was to declare PSK's upgrade void and strip him of the rights accordingly. However, this situation isn't his fault and that seems unfair. I have discussed the situation with other users - most notably Yuri - and decided that PSK should have a shot at keeping these rights by passing a retrospective RfB.
Should this vote not pass, PSK must regrettably have his privileges downgraded back to admin status. I hope this situation can be resolved quickly and to the community's satisfaction - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 19:42, December 3, 2013 (UTC)


If a user is nominated by another user, the nominee must accept the nomination. Briefly summarize why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. You may also wish to consider the following questions when writing your statement:

  1. How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?

I visit daily. There may have been a misconception that I was gone for the past month but the truth is I've been quite lazy in editing and only bothered to check for any needed rollbacks and blocks, which happened to be sorted out accordingly. As of now, I've been feeling a lot better getting back into the rhythm of things. From here on out I'd likely be editing just about daily.

  1. When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images) and which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would either of these change?

I already edit all spaces available. The larger changes I foresee would include administrative changes according to users (Promotions, etc.) and design which I am picking up on my own time.


2: Statistics

The following is for an admin to add:

As of December 3, 2013 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs)
  • Total edits: 1563 (Using Special:Editcount)
    • Of which 1082 (69.23%) are in the mainspace
    • Of which 119 (7.88%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: 40+ (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of stating precisely without counting manually)
    • Upload rating: (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
      • Good - Seem to be of good quality and the random selection I checked were all licensed properly
  • Total blocks: 0 (Using Special:Log)
    • Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: April 12, 2012 (according to userpage header)
  • Admin since: April 12, 2013

Signature of assessing admin: Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 19:42, December 3, 2013 (UTC)

3: Voting


Support: 6
Oppose: 0
Self-vote stuck out (rule revision) - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 01:36, December 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • Support - As a fellow nominee. Great user, editor, and admin (and soon-to-be B'crat). :) Flag of IranPLR SoldierTalkBF3 KH2002 ICON
  • Support - Might as well add my input though not much point by now -- awyman13FandomStaff.png (Talk/Work) 04:16, December 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • Neutral (Slightly supportive) - I feel PSK should keep his rights but I feel Awy should also become B'crat. (Nothing personal, I just feel two B'crats is better than one). By slightly supportive I mean I'm not supporting but neutral seems to harsh. (p.s. If I'm not allowed to say "Slightly supportive" please change it to neutral as I do not fully give my support for PSK to become B'crat.)--Hyperborrean22 (talk) 17:17, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
I have clarified your vote slightly to avoid confusion when counting vote totals - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 18:41, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • Neutral, leaning towards support - I haven't seen PSK really active here for a couple weeks, and tywin told me that he quit. If he comes back, then good choice NATO Rampantlion513 Wanna Talk? What I have done 03:41, December 7, 2013 (UTC)

This vote ends on December 7, at around midnight UTC. A neutral admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Successful

Bureaucrat action: Rights retained - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 21:27, December 7, 2013 (UTC)

</div>

X-AltEdit

The following is preserved only as an archive. Please do not modify it.
No further edits should be made to this discussion. If you want to continue a discussion, start a new post

1: Statements

Briefly summarize why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. You may also wish to consider the following questions when writing your statement:

  1. How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?
  2. When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images) and which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would either of these change?


  1. In recent times, I have not visited the wiki as often as I used to (Gaming rig in for repair, school and PS3 YLODing). But when I do, it is  usually a handful of moderate edits a few days inbetween each other. However, with Winter Break giving me some breathing room and my gaming rig back in action, I feel quite ready to help the wiki get on track with the recent release of BF4 (mainly with the lack of images and article description in the aforementioned game). Overall, I am certain you will see a spike in quality edit activity from me. In the end though, it is up to you to decide if I am worthy of the Administrator title.
  2. When I log in, I immediately check the recent activity tab to inform me of any events on the wiki that have happened\is ongoing while I have been away from my computer. When I edit, it is usually in the mainspace or images section(s). Whether or not my Request for Adminship succeeds, I will continue these habits of editing for the foreseeable future.   BFBC2 UMP45 ICONX-AltClickBF3 G53 ICON

2: Statistics

The following is for an admin to add:

As of December 20, 2013 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs)
  • Total edits: 2240 (Using Special:Editcount)
    • Of which 1287 (57.46%) are in the mainspace
    • Of which 197 (8.8%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: 200+ (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of stating precisely without counting manually)
    • Upload rating: (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
      • Good - All good quality and all of a random selection checked were properly licensed
  • Total blocks: 0 (Using Special:Log)
    • Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: May 27, 2012 (according to userpage header)
Signature of assessing admin: Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 23:10, December 20, 2013 (UTC)

3: Voting

Support: 2
Oppose: 4
  • Oppose - While I want to support this, as you have the knowledge and experiences, you have not been active lately, being inactive for weeks at a time. You yourself admitted this. On top of that while your activity may spike during winter break, what after? You'd just go through your cycles of inactivity again. -- awyman13FandomStaff.png (Talk/Work) 00:05, December 21, 2013 (UTC)
  • Support-- In honor of Kaiser Joseph I accept.--52nd TFSSlopijoeDown em allBF4 su50 00:16, December 21, 2013 (UTC)
  • Support - As Alt explained, it is about the quality of edits, not necessarily the amount of time spent editing and/or number of edits. We need an Admin (seeing as we have no one who is currently active). I feel promoting Alt would not only boost his time here, but we would have someone who we could rely on to conduct basic moderating skills while others may be offline. Flag of IranPLR SoldierTalkBF3 KH2002 ICON 01:23, December 22, 2013 (UTC)
We have no active admins? Last time I checked we had 5 active b'crats - three of them here for the long term... - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 01:29, December 22, 2013 (UTC)
I meant admins as in Administrators, the tier below B'crats. :) Flag of IranPLR SoldierTalkBF3 KH2002 ICON 01:37, December 22, 2013 (UTC)
But everything that admins can do, b'crats can do too - so if we have active b'crats, we don't need active admins. - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 01:40, December 22, 2013 (UTC)
I'm not planning on voting, but if I may -- I, as SSD before me, have been of the opinion that the number of admins need not be a factor when it comes to RFAs. Whomever deserves the spot ought to get it. As a matter of fact, bond, as I recall you were of the same opinion before you left the first time. I don't think the number of active administrators is really a valid reason to oppose, it's the other factors that matter. ЮраYuriKaslov - Sig image 08:11, December 22, 2013 (UTC)
I wasn't saying that it should be opposed purely for that reason - I was merely pointing out a gaping flaw in PLR's argument. As I explained below in my vote justification - I don't feel X-Alt has yet earned this promotion - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 15:52, December 22, 2013 (UTC)
  • Oppose - While I have nothing personal against X-Alt, I don't believe that we need another admin at the moment. Furthermore, I don't think the stats or activity levels are good enough to justify being upgraded to admin. Even if we needed another admin, X-Alt wouldn't currently be my first choice... - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 01:40, December 22, 2013 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per Bond. We have enough admins and he isn't even that active. NATO Rampantlion513 Wanna Talk? What I have done 01:58, December 22, 2013 (UTC)


After 4 days (or after 48 hours if the vote is unanimous), an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Unsuccessful

Bureaucrat action: N/A - Bondpedia (Contact) [ UserMonthRibbon AdminRibbon 800px-Template Ribbon ] 14:54, December 24, 2013 (UTC)

ArrowTwoActual

1: Statements

  • If you are nominating somebody else on their behalf, fill in section 1.1. The nominee should then complete section 1.2.
  • If you are nominating yourself, ignore 1.1 and only complete 1.2


1.1: Nominator's Statement

(This section should be completed by the nominator, if nominating somebody else. If you are self-nominating, ignore this section and proceed to section 1.2)

In a few sentences, summarize why you think the nominee is suitable for the role of an administrator.


1.2: Nominee's Statement

(This section should only be completed by the nominee)

If a user is nominated by another user, the nominee must accept the nomination. Briefly summarize why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. You may also wish to consider the following questions when writing your statement:

  1. How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?
  2. When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images) and which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would either of these change?


  • I think that I am prepared to step up to the role of Administrator, as I have been on this Wiki for a considerable amount of time, and I have been active on a regular basis for the last few months. I am familiar with editing code, and wiki conduct.
I visit nearly every day. Most days I edit a fair amount, but even when I do not, I check the recent activity, and look for any vandalism that needs to be rolled back, or any edits that need correcting. I regularly rollback vandals and give them warnings.
When I visit, I look over all that has happened in the Wiki activity, look to see if any users have questions I can answer, and see if there are any forum topics I should weigh in on. I work on adding info to Battlefield 4 pages, cleaning up or merging older pages, et cetera.
I mainly edit mainspace Articles, but I also contribute to Templates and Images, and regularly contact other users.
If my RfA were to succeed, I would sustain my current activity, but also try work more with the community and new users.
I know I have made a few mistakes editing pages, but I try to do my best and improve my editing. Thank you for considering my request.
UserMonthRibbon ArrowTwoActual talk
contribs.
20:52, January 25, 2014 (UTC)


2: Statistics

The following is for an admin to add:

As of January 26, 2014 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs)
    • Of which 1,251 (54.32%%) are in the mainspace
    • Of which 1,052 (45.68%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: ~200 (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of stating precisely without counting manually)
    • Upload rating: (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
      • Good - Most files have proper licensing and are of exceptional quality.
    • Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: June 2, 2012 (according to userpage header)
Signature of assessing admin: Flag of IranPLR SoldierTalkBF3 KH2002 ICON 16:02, January 26, 2014 (UTC)

3: Voting


Support: 2
Oppose: 0
  • Support - Excellent user who has proven himself during his time here. He already conducts actions that are fit for an Administrator's duties. Flag of IranPLR SoldierTalkBF3 KH2002 ICON 16:02, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
  • Support - Per PLR -- awyman13FandomStaff.png (Talk/Work) 16:26, January 26, 2014 (UTC)


After 4 days (or after 48 hours if the vote is unanimous), an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Successful Bureaucrat action: Upgraded -- awyman13FandomStaff.png (Talk/Work) 13:21, January 30, 2014 (UTC)

FluoxetinePatch

1: Statements

  • If you are nominating somebody else on their behalf, fill in section 1.1. The nominee should then complete section 1.2.
  • If you are nominating yourself, ignore 1.1 and only complete 1.2

1.1: Nominator's Statement

(This section should be completed by the nominator, if nominating somebody else. If you are self-nominating, ignore this section and proceed to section 1.2)

In a few sentences, summarize why you think the nominee is suitable for the role of an administrator.

  • Patch is a great editor and battlefield fan. He knows the rules of the wiki as well as having great knowledge of the series itself. His promotion to admin would be an invaluable edition to the Wiki. -- awyman13FandomStaff.png (Talk/Work) 06:06, October 26, 2014 (UTC)

1.2: Nominee's Statement

(This section should only be completed by the nominee)

If a user is nominated by another user, the nominee must accept the nomination. Briefly summarize why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. You may also wish to consider the following questions when writing your statement:

  1. How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?
  2. When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images) and which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would either of these change?


2: Statistics

The following is for an admin to add: As of October 26, 2014 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs) ◾Total edits: 1,308 (Using Special:Editcount)

  • Of which 756 (57.8%%) are in the mainspace
  • Of which 552(42.2%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: ~106 (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of stating precisely without counting manually)
  • Upload rating: (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
  • Good - Most files have proper licensing and are of exceptional quality.


  • Total blocks: 0 (Using Special:Log)
  • Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: September 15, 2011 (according to userpage header)

Signature of assessing admin: -- awyman13FandomStaff.png (Talk/Work) 06:06, October 26, 2014 (UTC)

3: Voting

Support: 1
Oppose: 0

Support - As nominator -- awyman13FandomStaff.png (Talk/Work) 06:06, October 26, 2014 (UTC)

After 4 days (or after 48 hours if the vote is unanimous), an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Successful

Bureaucrat action: Upgraded

Apprentice125

1: Statements

  • If you are nominating somebody else on their behalf, fill in section 1.1. The nominee should then complete section 1.2.
  • If you are nominating yourself, ignore 1.1 and only complete 1.2

1.1: Nominator's Statement

(This section should be completed by the nominator, if nominating somebody else. If you are self-nominating, ignore this section and proceed to section 1.2)

In a few sentences, summarize why you think the nominee is suitable for the role of an administrator.

  • AP is an excellent editor and contribitor to the wiki. I cannot describe the countless times he has uploaded excellent photos from the game code and implemented them here on the wiki. He also is adept with the wiki rules and policies and should be promoted to admin -- awyman13FandomStaff.png (Talk/Work) 06:06, October 26, 2014 (UTC)

1.2: Nominee's Statement

(This section should only be completed by the nominee)

If a user is nominated by another user, the nominee must accept the nomination. Briefly summarize why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. You may also wish to consider the following questions when writing your statement:

  1. How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?
  2. When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images) and which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would either of these change?
  • While I'm personally unsure as to whether or not I'm fit to be an admin, I accept Awy's nomination. I began actively editing here on the wiki sometime around March 2013, and have attempted to continue being active since then. I check on the wiki as often as I can, and I make sure to keep up with the recent activity feed to see if there is any vandalism I can clean up or to just keep up with ongoings on the wiki. I do not see my activity on the wiki faltering significantly in future, and intend keep up with my current amount, but I would attempt to work more with new users and the general community if I were to become an admin.
I primarily edit the mainspace, but as Awy mentioned, my sort of "speciality" here is getting and posting images. I have access to a good deal of editing and capture software, and have made good use of it to provide the wiki with media. I have contributed significantly in this regard to our Modern Combat and Bad Company pages, though I have also added a good deal of media for Battlefield 4 and Hardline as well. I always try to maintain the proper licensing with my images, and I have a good understanding of our copyright policies. I try to insure that my images are of good quality and will be useful to the wiki. Besides that, I also try to standardize pages; adding infoboxes, formatting, adding additional information and the like. I've also begun creating news blogs as well, primarily focusing on releases of new content, like trailers and game updates.
I try my hardest to be a good editor here, and I certainly hope I've given off that sort of impression. I have made mistakes in the past, but I always try improve wherever I can. Like I already stated, I'm not too sure if I'm admin material or if I'm that good of an editor, so I'll defer to the community's judgement with that. If I remain a rollback after this, I won't mind too much, and will continue with my current level of activity. Thank you for considering me for this position.
-Krylov FA-37 Apprentice125(Talk)03:38, October 28, 2014 (UTC)


2: Statistics

The following is for an admin to add: As of October 26, 2014 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs) ◾Total edits: 2,019 (Using Special:Editcount)

  • Of which 835 (41.4%%) are in the mainspace
  • Of which 1184(48.6%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: ~897 (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of stating precisely without counting manually)
  • Upload rating: (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
  • Excellent - Most files have proper licensing and are of exceptional quality.


  • Total blocks: 0 (Using Special:Log)
  • Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: October 15, 2011 (according to userpage header)

Signature of assessing admin: -- awyman13FandomStaff.png (Talk/Work) 06:06, October 26, 2014 (UTC)

3: Voting

Support: 1
Oppose: 0

Support - As nominator -- awyman13FandomStaff.png (Talk/Work) 06:06, October 26, 2014 (UTC)

After 4 days (or after 48 hours if the vote is unanimous), an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Successful

Bureaucrat action: Upgraded

Haunted330

1: Statements

  • If you are nominating somebody else on their behalf, fill in section 1.1. The nominee should then complete section 1.2.
  • If you are nominating yourself, ignore 1.1 and only complete 1.2


1.1: Nominator's Statement

I know what administrators and bureaucrats are supposed to do. (This section should be completed by the nominator, if nominating somebody else. If you are self-nominating, ignore this section and proceed to section 1.2)

In a few sentences, summarize why you think the nominee is suitable for the role of an administrator. I know what administrators and bureaucrats are supposed to do.


1.2: Nominee's Statement

(This section should only be completed by the nominee)

If a user is nominated by another user, the nominee must accept the nomination. Briefly summarize why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. You may also wish to consider the following questions when writing your statement:

  1. How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future? Sometimes.
  2. When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images) and which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would either of these change? Edit.



2: Statistics

The following is for an admin to add:

As of January 1, 2011 (This should be set to reflect when the statistics were added. The statistics should only be updated if a major change occurs)
  • Total edits: 0 (Using Special:Editcount)
    • Of which 0 (0%) are in the mainspace
    • Of which 0 (0%) are in private spaces (This is the number and percentage of edits in 'non-useful' areas - blogs, blog comments and your userpage. This allows us to see the number that aren't namespace, but are still 'useful' - files, templates, project pages, etc.)
  • Total file uploads: 0 (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of stating precisely without counting manually)
    • Upload rating: (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
      • Average - Explanation
  • Total blocks: 0 (Using Special:Log)
    • Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: January 1, 2010 (according to userpage header)
Signature of assessing admin:

3: Voting


Support: 0
Oppose: 3
  • Strongly Opposed - Just because you know what admins are supposed to do doesnt mean your fit to be one. On top of that you haven't even contributed to this Wikia at all and your contribution to Wikia as a whole is minimal at best. -- awyman13FandomStaff.png (Talk/Work) 16:27, September 2, 2015 (UTC)
  • Strongly Opposed - Per above. You have not contributed to this wiki at all. Plus, looks like you were starting trouble over at Community Central by spamming your personal wikis everywhere. I'd suggest you leave this wiki unless you're actually going to be contributing something useful here. -Krylov FA-37 Apprentice125(Talk)20:21, September 2, 2015 (UTC)
  • Strong Oppose - As stated above, you don't have any contributions on this wiki besides this nomination. I noticed that you've done this on other wikis as well; you can't just go ahead and ask for admin rights simply because you know what they are supposed to do when you haven't even edited on the involved wikis. Ultimate94ninja talk · contribs 11:01, September 3, 2015 (UTC)


After 4 days (or after 48 hours if the vote is unanimous), an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Unsuccessful, Invalid per nomination rules.

Bureaucrat action: None.

Nayhem

Nominator's Statement

Nayhem has been here over 7 Years. He has continually had great contributions to the Wiki and will continue to do so in the near future. A promotion to Admin is well deserved.

Nominee's Statement

While I did not request adminship for myself, I am humbly encouraged by awyman13's invitation, and the support given by others. I am not a prolific editor, mainly sticking to articles and the occasional edits to templates and images, but will happily weigh in where needed. With the CTE for BF1 ramping up, I anticipate contributing more overall. My focus will continue to be maintaining a professional tone in our articles, balancing the wealth of data and experiences with our readers' ability to comprehend and consume it, finding obscure information, and keeping an open eye to improvements from all contributors. I'm proud to be part of one of the finest wikis and accept this nomination. — Nayhem (talk) 01:28, January 31, 2017 (UTC)

Statistics

As of January 30, 2017
  • Total edits: 3669 (Using Special:Editcount)
    • Of which 2828 (77%) are in the mainspace
    • Of which 788 (21%) are in private spaces
  • Total file uploads: 53
    • Upload rating: Good
      • Average - Uploads are of good quality and properly licensed.
  • Total blocks: 0
    • Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: December 14, 2009 (according to userpage header)
Signature of assessing admin: -- awyman13FandomStaff.png (Talk/Work) 08:15, January 30, 2017 (UTC)

Voting


Support: 6
Oppose: 0
  • Support - As nominator I support this. -- awyman13FandomStaff.png (Talk/Work) 08:15, January 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • Support - I don't see why not. He deserves it. -- Aljohn Salceda 09:01, January 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • Support - Ditto. NotLessOrEqual 22:01, January 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • Support - Aye. Ultimate94ninja talk · contribs 11:07, January 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • Support - Ye. -- FluoxetinePatch (talk) 18:01, January 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • Support - Nayhem's been around longer than I have and has always made quality contributions, this is certainly deserved. -Krylov FA-37 Apprentice125(Talk)04:59, January 31, 2017 (UTC)


After 4 days (or after 48 hours if the vote is unanimous), an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Successful

Bureaucrat action: Rights Upgraded

FluoxetinePatch (b'crat)

Nominee's Statement

Early this morning, as a result of discussion on the wiki's official Discord, I was promoted to a Bureaucrat. While I appreciate the confidence the other members of the admin team have in me, the promotion was premature in that it did not follow past procedure. For the sake of record keeping and fair discourse, I am retroactively submitting a Request for Adminship, the voting process of which must, regardless of anticipated outcome, follow the same course and bear the same necessary consequences that every request of this type has thus far upheld.

That being said, I do accept the de-facto nomination. While my interest in the Battlefield franchise and corresponding commitment to the wiki has waxed and waned over the seven years I have been here, I'd like to think my overall contributions have been, at times, essential, but at the very least useful. Recently I have had the time available to help bring Battlefield 1's articles, particularly the map pages but also weapons, vehicles and codex entries, up to standard. While this is an ongoing endeavour and one that I intend to continue going forward, the perception that Battlefield 1's article set has reached a level of completeness and consistency unseen in most other subsequent iterations of the series is of great pride to me, knowing that I played a part in making it happen. It has been a joy to work alongside such a motivated and proficient group of admins and TUs, whose own enthusiasm has significantly boosted my own via their exemplary work ethic, reliability and sense of community, the likes of which I had feared I would never see again after the stagnation in the years following Battlefield Hardline's release.

While I still feel vastly inexperienced compared to those who have come before me, I realise that I owe this community much for the sense of satisfaction provided by participating in it, and that it is time for me to accept greater responsibility as a result. Should my promotion be approved, the additional tools granted will assuredly be a useful asset going forward. Continuing to build the site, assisting in giving older titles' articles the BF1 level of treatment, and seeing the opportunities and challenges posed by Battlefield V's upcoming release, will be a privilege I never expected to be party to, but one I will steadfastly embrace, knowing the quality of the community I belong to. --FluoxetinePatch (talk) 02:45, July 8, 2018 (UTC)

2: Statistics

The following is for an admin to add:

As of July 8, 2018
  • Total edits: 10304 (Using Special:Editcount)
    • Of which 3550 (34.45%) are in the mainspace
    • Of which 849 (8.26%) are in private spaces
  • Total file uploads: 3118 (Using Special:Log - Just a rough estimate, there's no way of stating precisely without counting manually)
    • Upload rating: (The admin compiling the statistics should take a brief glance through the nominees uploads, then based on the amount that have been deleted, that are improperly licensed and that are of poor quality, give a rough rating, eg. Bad, Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, etc. Please also leave a comment explaining this rating)
      • Average - Explanation
  • Total blocks: 0 (Using Special:Log)
    • Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: September 15, 2011 (according to userpage header)
Signature of assessing admin:

3: Voting


Support: 6
Oppose: 0


  • Support -- with The Amount of Battlefield 1 Map article improvement and other stuff Lamicrosz (talk) 05:45, July 8, 2018 (UTC)
  • Support -- You've continually been an excellent editor and contributor to the wiki for all the time I've worked with you. A promotion to B'crat is more than deserved for the work you've done. -Krylov FA-37 Apprentice125(Talk)12:21, July 8, 2018 (UTC)
  • Support — -- awyman13FandomStaff.png (Talk/Work) 13:29, July 8, 2018 (UTC)

After 4 days (or after 48 hours if the vote is unanimous), an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive


Result: Successful

Bureaucrat action: Rights Upgraded -Krylov FA-37 Apprentice125(Talk)23:52, July 10, 2018 (UTC)

Lamicrosz

1: Statements

1.1: Nominator's Statement

Lamicrosz has been on the wiki for just under two years now, and his value to the community has been vastly disproportionate in regards to the time he's been here - in a positive way, of course! Aside from significant contributions to the Battlefield 1 article set, notably taking a lead on constantly updating Easter Egg and Incursions information, he has also been instrumental in keeping up with the stream of information in the run up to the release of Battlefield V. The setting of personal editing goals, providing advice and support to other team members, and the proficiency in identifying and fulfilling vacant roles, such as his timely uploading of official trailers and dev talks, show considerable organisational and communication skills, as well as pro-activity. This is combined with his consistent vetting of edits, and the fostering of a welcoming and informative environment on our Discord. As such I have supreme confidence in his competencies as an admin. --FluoxetinePatch (talk) 19:25, November 10, 2018 (UTC)


1.2: Nominee's Statement

(This section should only be completed by the nominee)

If a user is nominated by another user, the nominee must accept the nomination. Briefly summarize why you think you are suitable for the role of an administrator. You may also wish to consider the following questions when writing your statement:

  1. How often do you visit and how often do you edit? Do you anticipate your activity levels changing in the foreseeable future?
  2. When you visit, what do you typically do (eg. edit, read, check the forums/blogs, check recent changes, upload images) and which pages do you mainly edit (eg. Articles, Forums, Blogs, Templates, Talks, Images, User)? If you were made an admin, would either of these change?



2: Statistics

As of November 10, 2018
  • Total edits: 2941 (Using Special:Editcount)
    • Of which 1922 (65.35%) are in the mainspace
    • Of which 1019 (34.65%) are in private spaces
  • Total file uploads: ~850
    • Upload rating:
      • Excellent - All images and videos have been appropriately licenced and sourced from as near as day one, and has a habit of replacing images with ones of higher quality as they become available.
  • Total blocks: 0
    • Totalling a block time of 0 hours
  • Active since: March 19, 2017
Signature of assessing admin: --FluoxetinePatch (talk) 19:25, November 10, 2018 (UTC)

3: Voting


Support: 4
Oppose: 0


After 4 days (or after 48 hours if the vote is unanimous), an admin will close the discussion, file the results below, and move the discussion to the archive

Result: Successful

Bureaucrat action: Rights upgraded. --FluoxetinePatch (talk) 22:59, November 13, 2018 (UTC)

</div>

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.