FANDOM


(Merging)
(Merging)
Line 4: Line 4:
   
 
:BF1's No 1 SMLE and 1942's No 4 differ about as much as the [[M16]] variants; to my knowledge the No 4 really just has a stronger bolt and a heavier barrel. Compared to the case with something like the [[CAR-15]] and the [[M4]], the SMLE and No 4 are still the same gun, so I'd support merging them into either one SMLE or Lee-Enfield article. -{{Signatures/Apprentice125}}21:18, June 6, 2016 (UTC)
 
:BF1's No 1 SMLE and 1942's No 4 differ about as much as the [[M16]] variants; to my knowledge the No 4 really just has a stronger bolt and a heavier barrel. Compared to the case with something like the [[CAR-15]] and the [[M4]], the SMLE and No 4 are still the same gun, so I'd support merging them into either one SMLE or Lee-Enfield article. -{{Signatures/Apprentice125}}21:18, June 6, 2016 (UTC)
  +
  +
They are as different as M16 and M4. [[User:YuriKaslov|<span style="color:green">Юра</span>]][[file:YuriKaslov - Sig image.gif|15px|link=User talk:YuriKaslov]] 23:57, June 6, 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:57, June 6, 2016

Merging

Given the fact that weapons variants (that are close to each other) are usually together in one page on the BF wiki, shouldn't this be merged with the No 4? Ultimate94ninja talk · contribs 19:51, June 6, 2016 (UTC)

BF1's No 1 SMLE and 1942's No 4 differ about as much as the M16 variants; to my knowledge the No 4 really just has a stronger bolt and a heavier barrel. Compared to the case with something like the CAR-15 and the M4, the SMLE and No 4 are still the same gun, so I'd support merging them into either one SMLE or Lee-Enfield article. -Krylov FA-37 Apprentice125(Talk)21:18, June 6, 2016 (UTC)

They are as different as M16 and M4. ЮраYuriKaslov - Sig image 23:57, June 6, 2016 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.