Adressing Other UsersEdit
As for Ramp, please don't snap like such. Just cool off, let things go, and don't let it happen again, as a favor for everyone, let's ignore it.
Merging of SpecializationsEdit
That's something I'm not so sure about. It's like weapons in that some have different names and are split it. Eh, I'd say keep them apart because not all of them would marge well, and it'd be awkward.
You Do Have a PointEdit
The Bad Company and Bad Company 2 Multiplayer pages are a bit pointless considering that everything in them have their own respective articles. But let me check that with the other admins first.
And remember what we talked about. There are more users out there who can do such.
- I blocked them. It was one user, by the way. Same IP.
Knowing you I think you would've asked me to do it for you. besides you used shitty lowres versions of them Юра 05:21, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
- both were lowres, one had the top clipped off.
- and no, "fair use" implies there's any copyright at all when in fact US govt images are unde rpublic domain, ie having no copyright and being free to use anyway
- I was almost a lawyer, do you really thingk I don't know what I'm talking about ?Юра 05:28, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
Sorry For the Late Reply Edit
Marking pages for deletionEdit
Haven't I told you to knock that off? Юра 20:01, July 20, 2013 (UTC)
- We both know i explained my reasons. Not like i would delete a page without cause. In the end, only or another admin can delete them anyway. -- awyman13 Talk Work 00:01, July 21, 2013 (UTC)
Honestly, I don't know. I watch subbed. Юра 03:08, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
Good Luck! :) Edit
Wish you the best at school and during Air Force training! With peace.12:14, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
Re: Good Luck! Edit
Thanks man, much appreciated!21:55, August 8, 2013 (UTC)
Thanks a lot, man! :D03:12, August 14, 2013 (UTC)
Done, thanks!19:32, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, he continued to edit even after the warning. It's been done, thanks.03:06, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
Re: Combining Specializations Edit
Looks like Ranger already deleted them. I deleted the missing one you put up.18:15, August 20, 2013 (UTC)
Re: Levolution Trailer Edit
Thanks for the notice. I was wondering when the trailer would be uploaded to the Battlefield YouTube channel. And thank you for the complement. I think it's a pretty big number of edits that amazes me. Rangers Lead The Way 21:15, August 20, 2013 (UTC)
Re: You're Golden! Edit
Yeah, but I had to update it myself in the Wiki.css page after some assistance from the guys at the Community Wiki. Thanks, though! :)17:53, August 21, 2013 (UTC)
Re: ACE Variants Edit
Would you please do me a favour and watch this video? It pretty much shows "almost" all of the weapons in the game.
Re: Upgrade Paths Template Edit
Sure thing. I do actually have a microphone though, it's just busted and I'm quite a lazy person sometimes. Also, prepare to laugh at my lack of skill as I've been away from it for so long. ;P
One or more of your recent comments on Battlefield Wiki were considered to be unacceptable and have been deleted. In accordance with code of conduct, if you continue in your current trend, you will be blocked. Thank You
Simply undo the edit and move on.--21:48, August 27, 2013 (UTC)
... on your fresh talk page! :p
Speaking of which, I should probably archive mine sometime.00:27, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks! Been trying to figure out the formatting on my Second Archive though. Screwed up for some reason.
Re: Favor Edit
Sure, I'll get right to it.00:49, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
Got it fixed, took awhile, but it has been done.01:35, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
I don't. Юра 03:18, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
Re: Vandal Edit
Done and done. Thanks for notifying me.03:50, August 31, 2013 (UTC)
Dino Mode PageEdit
Can you please explain me why you marked my page for deletion ? I don't understand what I did wrong :( - MongerCrow
Re: Delete Alert Edit
Could have been an honest mistake; it was already deleted though.17:49, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
What did I tell you about bitting Comments? IDGAF if that person insulted the president himself, don't even remotely use the subject/summary for any strong language (shit, damn or fuck).--06:42, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
Don't worry about that whole ordeal, you did nothing wrong.18:57, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
There is grief on Ballistic Scope by an not-registered user. He mades multiple edit so, i can't do nothing.
Done. Thanks.18:47, September 6, 2013 (UTC)
I'll also lock the policy pages to registered users only.18:48, September 6, 2013 (UTC)
No, all users are treated equal.--21:24, September 6, 2013 (UTC)
- These are policy pages, not actual articles. It has only been restricted from unregistered/new users for the sake of prevention. This does not necessarily = inequality. It is locked for the same reasons for something like Wiki.css or the Home page is locked. 13:23, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
you made a false accusation that all anon that edit the policy page are vandals in your statement that "all anon love to vandalize that page".--21:45, September 6, 2013 (UTC)
Re: Note Edit
Thanks for the heads-up, but I'm not exactly sure if I want to stay on a wiki where two bureaucrats are hostile towards me with the other one suggesting I leave and don't come back and the other one breaking a specific policy. --23:07, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
You are not to even remotely touch ramps talk page. You had no involvement in the affairs of today and it was over by the time you responded.
Good? Now remove yourself from the affairs of today.--23:13, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
May I make a suggestion? Edit
You should put your sig as a template so instead of typing all that code into the wiki sig box, you just type in the template as edit that for 2 reasons 1. It's easier to edit if you want a new one or something is broken 2. It adds less bytes to the page which gives the Internet more memory :D
Yeah? Well how was my crusty, saggy, sweaty balls in your face after I fucking RAPED YOU! Jack [signing] off! 23:33, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
RE: New Template Edit
Looks good, I'll see what I can do.06:49, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
Dont Trust JackEdit
Look I don't trust very much that Jack person on this wiki. Remember how he talked to me just because I did a little mistake ? - MongerCrow September 14, 2013 (UTC)
I mean I just think he is kind of rude. Remember that kind of punishment he said to me because I created a page about a thing that doesn't exist? - MongerCrow September 14, 2013 (UTC)
Oh whatever. :P Jack [signing] off! 22:40, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
Dont do it again. You were insulting other users as well.--02:50, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
Exactly, currently I want status quo. Something this wiki needs...--03:11, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, airman. It'd be cool if you became a PJ. Stop drinking the haterade and start drinking the bubble tea! 23:43, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the helpEdit
Thanks for fixing up some of my edits. I'm pretty new to the whole Wikia stuff, so I really appreciate it when someone (especially a long-time Wikia user) helps by correcting some of my editing/formatting mistakes (ex. the Colt M1911 page). Thanks again. CakeBurning (talk) 23:35, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
Roll back everything much faster.--17:48, September 18, 2013 (UTC)
- I think all of it is cleaned up now. Worst case of vandalism in awhile. 18:19, September 18, 2013 (UTC)
News Award Edit
|For consistently keeping our news feed up-to-date. Congrats, you earned it!|
Revoked, given without other admins discussion.--14:56, October 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Whoa, whoa, whoa. There was a vote over a month ago, I only recently issued it to him since I forgot to earlier. 18:17, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Disputing it could have been done during the time the nomination was still active. 18:20, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
ye bez stay uvv reded wik, FREN --anonb3ast
I clarified it, I'll still be around.00:23, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
- I reasoned that multiple links to the same article is unnecessary, and that the infobox links take presidence.--Ant2242 (talk) 06:59, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
Remove Leaked Content Edit
I just read that the achievements were leaked. Please remove all information obtained from the list or I'm going to have to issue a warning, man. :/ 00:53, October 8, 2013 (UTC)
I can't link you to it directly (as per policy), but it was leaked by ExoPhase. It was never officially released to news outlets. Now please heed my request.02:46, October 8, 2013 (UTC)
Anything that was added/created due to what was leaked must be removed, be it descriptions, pages, images, etc.03:09, October 8, 2013 (UTC)
Everything, man. That includes campaign levels, character info, templates, etc.06:20, October 8, 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, Awyman. I know it is already out there on reputable news/fan sites, but the information was leaked, regardless. I have set the pages to locked until release day at midnight (unless, of course, DICE or EA decides to reveal them officially). Don't forget the characters and campaign level pages and template. Thanks again, man, and sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused you.18:32, October 8, 2013 (UTC)
Re: Image LicensingEdit
RE: Image Licensing Edit
Sorry for that, i just forget to do it. I repair the mistake :)
Thanks for your message Edit
Hi Austin. Thanks for your message on Wikipedia, it's nice to see I'm still remembered around here. I have to say, the community's barely recognizable from when I was active here last, I'm glad to see you've managed to recruit a new 'generation' of people.
I'm also glad to see you have got yourself a role as a 'Trusted User'. When you first came here, I remember you had a little disagreement with SSD about something that slips my mind, but I'm glad you've tried to improve your editing ethic. That's what I set the Trusted User scheme up for - people who clearly mean well and want to support the community, but who aren't yet the 'finished product' and want to get better.
However, I notice you've been having a few problems still with other users? I haven't looked into the details, but it would be a shame to see anything regrettable happen, since I believe you mean well. I'd suggest you take the time to read or re-read the Code of Conduct, it should be useful (or at least I hope it should, I wrote it). If you ever need any help or advice, send me a message.
Unfortunately, I have no intention of returning. I'm still studying at university, in my final year, so I really have no time for helping run the wiki like I used to - and since I haven't had free time for gaming for years now, I'd be pretty damn useless at contributing to articles.
I still check in with the site every now and then to see how you're all getting on. I also still have email notifications for my talk page, so if anyone here ever needs any serious help or need my input for something important, just give me a shout...
Keep it up! Edit
Keep up the great work, Awyman!05:54, October 14, 2013 (UTC)
RE:Your Revisions Edit
Thank you for the precision you bring to the matter. I don't really like when people say, "Use this weapon with this attachment!" or "This iron sight is really good compared to..." (youtuber style ^^). It's as if we could not have our own opinion (like with the m16A3 in BF3). :)
PS: sorry for my english. I'm french and i try to do my best xD
Well... hmmm you're fast ^^
Campaign Notice + Future Overhaul Edit
Hey Awyman, keep up the good work. Regarding your edit to the War of 2014 talk page, I would advise holding off for just one more month (linking campaigns together) Going to be bringing a major overhaul soon to everything BF3/BF4-related, campaign-wise, once I have finally played. Not stopping you or anyone from editing (just an advisory), but just letting you know (I know I can count on you) as to what is to come. Keep up the great editing; it is definitely being noted. :)00:09, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Ah, are you serious? There's GameStop for you, lol. Hope you get your copy soon.
18:46, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Definitely going to watch it later tonight. 00:29, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
Regular. Also, Kovic does seem very similar to Whistler. I'd think they're the same, but I'll stick with you in waiting for concrete. Hope you get it soon, man. I'm gonna be a helluva lot active again. So much potential. But, all this rushed flawed information from Anons is crap, though. No pain, no gain, though right? Bleh. -- Ha-HA! 00:24, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
Re: Edit-- 04:54, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
Its called a .GIF. It animates... deal with the editor. Dont act harshly.--05:13, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
Battlefield 4 page Edit
Yes we need evidence as we're combining two pages. I know the evidence is strong and probably true but we're not doing it until we get confirmation from DICE or EA. awyman13 Talk Work 01:25, November 4, 2013 (UTC)
Re: RFA Edit
Absolutely man, will do in a couple of hours later today. :)16:58, November 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Done. Good luck! :)
17:17, November 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Only when it ends, a B'crat will take the appropriate action. Voting has begun. 17:56, November 5, 2013 (UTC)
Re: Merge Edit
Will do.18:41, November 7, 2013 (UTC)
BF4 page Images EditBleh. -- Ha-HA! 03:59, November 9, 2013 (UTC)
y0 wut happ3nd to yur SAIL m0sic
Fully aware. The reason why I am continuing it is because this is a admin doing this. And I have a user telling me this. Rather disappointing. I would love someone to break it up eventually. Thank you, for telling me. AndImBatman
Do not understand, what's wrong with these screenshots?
- My pleasure. I've set you up a gold username highlight but it might take a few hours to show up. Well done and keep up the good work. - Bondpedia (Contact) [ ] 17:38, November 10, 2013 (UTC)
The policy looks good. I don't know if it's been approved by vote, but it will have to be before it can be official. As you're now an admin, you can access the deleted version here (it's in wikicode, rather than visual editor, I hope that's not a problem). The new version is much more comprehensive, but you might like to look at the old one and incorporate anything missing. - Bondpedia (Contact) [ ] 17:45, November 10, 2013 (UTC)
No problem. I edit in source anyhow. Ill take a look
Congrats on becoming an admin. Well-deserved. :)18:25, November 10, 2013 (UTC)
Good job awy! Wish you luck!
21:16, November 10, 2013 (UTC)
Is this confirmed or just a rumor? Edit
Game sites on the web are saying that some info in Latin America regarding China Rising is leaked. It says (in spanish) that there is 4 new maps, 5 new weapons, new vehichles and advanced technology (the latter is already known), 10 assignments, and 2 weeks early access to premium (also known). I know it can't be put in an article, but is it okay to be in a blog for news? Here is one of the sources: http://www.vg247.com/2013/11/13/battlefield-4-china-rising-dlc-map-names-leaked-air-superiority-mode-to-return-report/
Second assault weapon/gadget Edit
What do you think about that ? The guys says he finds it in the test range after the patch. Can we considered that is confirmed information
He says that he find it in the custom menu of the test range. ACtually, i'm at office so i can't know if he 's wrong or not.
Here is the link to the reddit page. The simpliest way to confirmed it is to go to the test range and check. For the fact that you can unlock it before the released of China rising, i think that it's just normal. The released of CR is planed for the 3rd December for everybody, two weeks ealier for the Premium member (ie the 19th november) AND another week earlier for Xbox Premium member (ie this week.)
Press the bill in, teach the idiots a lesson that THIS IS OUR WIKI, not the frenchs. At the moment re-open the blog as an example...--01:29, November 15, 2013 (UTC)
Technically we could have a new group patrol blogs. hmm we'll call it the okrama and get on chat.--02:29, November 15, 2013 (UTC)